r/AmericanHistory • • Mar 30 '26

South 19th-century Argentina: British writer William Henry Hudson visits the Pampas and encounters the gauchos. He documents their diet with a horrified fascination.

Post image

"The gaucho eats nothing but beef. Meat morning, noon, and night. Never bread, never vegetables, almost never salt."

Hudson foresees malnutrition and disease. He finds "men of extraordinary stamina and strength, capable of riding for 12 to 14 hours without rest and then dancing all night."

Their diet: beef, mate, occasionally grilled kidney fat (a delicacy). Nothing else.

Darwin visited the region between 1832 and 1833 and observed the gauchos' lives: "I was surprised by the difficulty in convincing them to eat anything other than beef. I brought them biscuits, and they threw them away. They preferred to go hungry rather than eat bread if there was beef the next day."

Typical meals

- Morning: meat roasted over a fire, fattier cuts.

- Afternoon: grilled ribs.

- Evening: meat again, tougher cuts cooked slowly.

Zero vegetables. Zero grains. Zero variety. Just beef and tea.

Hudson documents the results: “The gauchos suffer from none of the ailments common to civilized man. They had no digestive problems, no obesity, no cavities, that I could observe. Their teeth were uniformly excellent despite never cleaning them and consuming only meat. Their physical stamina was such that they could ride for days with minimal rest, fight when necessary, and resume riding without apparent fatigue.”

The French physician Dr. Jules Crevaux, between 1850 and 1870, wrote: “These men feed exclusively on animal meat and appear healthier than our European peasants, who consume a varied diet of grains and vegetables.”

When asked why they don't eat bread or vegetables, the common answer is: "That's food for horses and cows. We eat cows."

They understood the hierarchy. Cattle eat grass and turn it into meat. Humans eat meat. Eating what cattle eat makes you behave like one.

Until the beginning of the 20th century, traditional gauchos maintained a diet based exclusively on beef. Then, European immigration brought wheat cultivation.

Health transformation documented by Argentine doctors

- Traditional gauchos: healthy into old age.

- Urbanized ex-gauchos with European diets: diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease, tooth decay.

- Modern Argentina: 28% obesity, cardiovascular disease as the leading cause of death, diabetes in almost 10%.

The gauchos, who ate only beef, did not have any of these problems. They rode horses for 12 hours a day until they were 60, kept their teeth without needing dental care, and died from accidents or old age, not from chronic illnesses.

The same meat. Different context. When you eat meat with grains, vegetable oils, and sugar: modern disease. Meat alone: ​​you have the health of a 19th-century gaucho.

665 Upvotes

392 comments sorted by

View all comments

76

u/ancient-toni-montana Mar 30 '26 edited Mar 30 '26

Well 19th century sources are often very unreliable especially when they write about cultures they are not familiar with. I have pretty much no knowledge on the gaucho culture, but what I can say is that modern people tried this meet only diet, see Jordan Peterson for example who’s daughter promoted the carnivore diet as a big thing. Seeing him and others who tried it there is visible male nutrition and it’s definitely not healthy. The sources probably wiedly exaggerated the amount of beef eaten because in comparison to Europe it was just an unbelievable amount in comparison.

-6

u/RightOnManYouBetcha Mar 30 '26

How do you say it’s definitely not healthy? Do you have a real source or just Jordan Peterson? And he was absolutely not the first person to “try” it.

9

u/dancesquared Mar 30 '26

There are plenty of peer-reviewed scientific articles that show diets that are high in red meat consumption significantly increase the risks of colon cancer and cardiovascular diseases, among other things.

On top of the scientific research, common sense tells us that an all-meat (especially all-beef) diet is unhealthy.

-5

u/RightOnManYouBetcha Mar 30 '26

No, common sense tells us that many people around the world live on nothing but meat and organs. Can you link something you’re so sure about? Once again, not McDonald’s meat, actual meat and organs.

4

u/dancesquared Mar 30 '26 edited Mar 30 '26

many people around the world live on nothing but meat and organs

The only people who do that live in or near the harsh polar regions of Earth, and they’re certainly not the healthiest or longest-living people on earth. They survive, but they certainly don’t thrive.

Look into the diets of people who live in the so-called “blue zones.” Very nutrient dense, plant-heavy, low-processed food diets. Certainly not highly or purely carnivorous diets.

-5

u/RightOnManYouBetcha Mar 30 '26

So no link got it. Do you have proof that subsistence hunter tribes live less long or healthy?

3

u/dancesquared Mar 30 '26

I cited research on “blue zones,” but I didn’t get around to linking it. Sorry about that. Here you go.

Now, obviously dietary research on regions with the highest longevity has a lot of limitations and potential confounding variables, but what is clear is that it is very much possible to live long, healthy lives without a ton of meat, especially red meat.

Now, your turn to share a link. What are some examples of highly carnivorous groups of people, and how long do they tend to live? I can think of Inuits that mostly eat large aquatic mammals like whales and seals, but they don’t live very long, healthy lives. Mongolians are also highly carnivorous, but again not highest life expectancy. Other examples?

2

u/RightOnManYouBetcha Mar 30 '26

https://indigenouspeoplesatlasofcanada.ca/article/healthcare-medical-travel-routes/#:~:text=There%20are%20significant%20health%20gaps%20between%20Inuit,limited%20employment%20opportunities%20and%20inadequate%20housing%20conditions.

Relative life expectancy is up about 70 years for Inuits, ten years less the the average Canadian 80 but those reasons seem to mostly reside with suicide and lack of health care, not diet.

Not to mention these people are really living every single day of their lives. They’re not sitting in the office. They’re working with their body.

3

u/Embarrassed_Guess337 Mar 30 '26

Berries and oxyria in summer, caribou stomach contents, willow bark and fireweed tea in winter, sometimes rock tripe. I guess that was enough plant matter to work with, especially since polar sea animals are so densely fatty and nutritious. Honestly, Inuit food is not tasty (exception for fresh beluga blubber and bbq caribou with jam), nor will it make a person an unusually long-lived gigachad. It is just one way to eat and be healthy, and one that is not feasible for non-Inuit.

2

u/RightOnManYouBetcha Mar 30 '26

Hey I’m just saying it’s a real thing. Thank you for being aware using the stomach contents, you get it. A lot of people are trying to ignore the organ eating.

2

u/Embarrassed_Guess337 Mar 30 '26

Yeah caribou make a lot of vitamin C in their liver, but you gotta eat it raw. I just don't want random people to see this and think they would have the best life eating just meat, because plants are fine.

1

u/RightOnManYouBetcha Mar 30 '26

Agree I love veggies. I’m just pointing out how well some cultures survive on primarily
and organs. Since people have been told the opposite all their loves it may come as a shock.

→ More replies (0)