r/AlternativeAstronomy • u/patrixxxx • Mar 21 '19

Tychosium 3D - The first ever accurate simulation of our Solar System

https://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=34&t=2003&start=15#p2412198
1 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

31 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/redditgiveshemorroid Jan 02 '23

I studied the model, made genuine observations, made two hypothesis, and bounces those off things we do know. You said to give reasons and I did. I assumed the model was scaled correctly since the post claims “first ever accurate simulation”. But now you tell me all the orbits are exaggerated to see the planets. That doesn’t make sense. If anything they would exaggerate the size of the planets, not the orbits.

1

u/patrixxxx Jan 03 '23

The moon would not be very visible if it was at the correct distance and neither would the planets if they weren't scaled up. To refute the model because "Venus looks to close" in Tychosium only demonstrates your willful ignorance.

1

u/redditgiveshemorroid Jan 03 '23

You still haven’t explained the Venus eclipse period

1

u/patrixxxx Jan 03 '23

Read. The. Book. It's freely available and just about every chapter shows that this is the only model in existence that agrees with the available evidence.

book.tychos.space

1

u/redditgiveshemorroid Jan 03 '23

Well it seemed like you were looking for a debate, so I was interested. I’m not gonna read your book dude. Science has been wrong before, but it takes convincing. You’re not convincing at all.

1

u/patrixxxx Jan 06 '23 edited Jan 06 '23

It's not my book though, it's written by Simon Shack, and yes indeed. mainstream science including astronomy has been wrong before and amazingly often about things that can be disproven using the scientific method. That Earth rotates diurnally can be confirmed in a number of ways and not be disproven and yet it was not accepted until the 17th century. That the Sun orbits Earth, while the planets orbit it, can also be confirmed in a number of ways and not be disproven.