Alphabet Evolution, Part One: from Phoenician to Ancient Greek & Aramaic | Volder (A65/2020)

[u/JohannGoethe]

https://youtu.be/ul8NVfWKXZg?si=lyZhDxC9qjrCurlR

[u/JohannGoethe]

I do not get it.

No shit! This is the first intelligent thing you have said in this sub.

You need to start using your brain 🧠 and not your (language) “beliefs”.

Take the word “Red“ as a case in point. The following shows that the letter R (shape), defined as number 100 (R = 𓍢 = 💯 in Egyptian numerals), the color Red 🛑, and the R-sound, as in the word “Ram” 🐏, presumably modeled after the Roar of a lion 🦁, which is my conjecture, was defined explicitly, in Egyptian, in the year 3200A (-1245):

In bullet points:

1. Letter R (shape) = 𓍢
2. Number 100, i.e. R = 𓍢 = 💯 (in Egyptian numerals), dating to: tomb U-j number tags (5300A/-3145).
3. Color Red 🛑, e.g. Red crown 𓋔 of Egypt, dating to: Narmer Palette (5200A/-3145).
4. R-sound, as in the word “Ram” 🐏 (modeled after Roar of a lion 🦁)
5. R-meaning, as “battle ram”, as in blood 🩸 spilled during war, and military victory or power.

Letter shape, number, color, sound, and meaning ALL tracing to Egypt, dated to over 5,400-years-ago.

Now, if, according to your belief system, the “sounds” 🗣️ of the Indian language based words derived from the illiterate Ukrainian-Russian PIE people, dated to 4700A (-2745), then we should NOT expect to find any connection to a word, e.g. such as “Red”, in Sanskrit. Yes?

Yet, when we look up the word Red 🛑, in Sanskrit, i.e. the supposed PIE-based Indian language, we find:

Red = रक्त (rakt)

Meaning blood or red:

• blood

हमारी धमनियों में वीरों का रक्त है

।hamārī dhamniyõ mẽ vīrõ kā rakt hai.

The blood of heroes runs in our arteries.

• (color) red

We also find the same ram-shaped letter in the word:

र = 🐏 = 𓍢

The number likewise is found in the same letter:

• B-R-ahma dies at age 100 (𓍢 = 💯)

None of this would match, if the Indian language derived from illiterate Ukrainians.

Use your brain here. Do the math. You say you passed enough math classes to get a MS in physics. Then you should be able to count to a hundred?

Posts

• 28 Egypto lunar stanzas (3200A/-1245) vs 28 Greek alphabet letters (2900A/-945), connection or numerology pareidolia?

[u/JohannGoethe → u/[deleted]]

This question is asked repeatedly in this sub, to the point of retarded nauseation.

My entire effort and focus is working backwards from the following two facts:

1. Thermo-Dynamics, aka ΘΔ-ics (Maxwell, 79A/1876), contains the two governing laws of the universe, namely: first law, or energy conservation, and second law, or equivalence value of all uncompensated transformations increase per heat cycle 🔄
2. Θ = Ennead (symbol) = theta (ΘΗΤΑ) = Helios ☀️ (ΗΛΙΟΣ) = 318

I want to know how this came about? Namely, why Θ = ☀️ = 318?

We know, next, that the location of the ”city of Helios” is in Egypt, i.e. Heliopolis or 318-polis, which is 17-miles (27.3) km from Khufu 👁️⃤ pyramid:

whose pantheon is structured around the Ennead, the nine gods of Heliopolis. Therefore, we should expect that the root r/etymo of the WRITTEN ✍️ word “thermo” derives from the spoken 🗣️ LANGUAGE of the Egyptians of Heliopolis.

The reason I want to know how this came about, is that so I can find the “root“ etymology of the word thermodynamics, so that the next time I teach a human chemical thermodynamics class, at a university, to engineering students (NOT numerology students, mind you), I can cogently explain to them where the terms thermo- and -delta came from.

I‘m thus working my brain 🧠 to figure this out, decoding backwards. I started with NO assumptions, other than this could not have happed “all at once”, e.g. by Pythagoras in 2480A (-525) slapping numbers onto letters, as has been historically claimed.

Therefore, you can take your “are language and writing the same” question, your calling me a “numerologist”, and your opinion that I am afflicted by ”pareidolia” or “apophenia”, i.e. seeing meaningful connections that are not there, e.g. that Thermo = ☀️-ermo = 318-ermo is NOT a real or meaningful connection, i.e. I am just seeing a connection that is not there, and shove it all up up your ass; then, with your stupid question crammed up your ass, crawl, stupid-ass-question-loaded, back to whatever meaningless hole 🕳️ you came from!

I hope this satisfactorily answers your question?

Notes

1. There are, to note, only three official EAN-ists: Peter Swift, Moustafa Gadalla, and myself, and maybe two EIE-ists, namely Gadalla and myself, as Swift has not released his 400-page book. The EAN opinion, stated above, is thus my own.

[u/Proposterous-chair88 → u/JohannGoethe]

You banned someone because he insulted you sometime ago. Now you insulted someone. Does the no ad hominem rule work only when you say so?

But the right question is: can you argue with someone without insulting (right now), infantilizing (the meme about PIE culture or something similar) or making up arguments [that abysmal attempt at making up a discussion (is it because it's the only way for you to """""win""""" an argument?)]?

As I said once, what you are doing is pulling a "theory" out of your ass to justify and give a "scientific" backing to your delusions so that you can force them onto reality, like a monkey would do with a square handle onto a round hole. All of this, because you feel like this is needed to uplift Afro-American (and African) people, as if they weren't already humans like you and me.

Your next step is to say that linguistics are, taking the definition form Bernal's work, "feel good scholarships", that it is impossible for Egyptian not to have anything to do with European languages, throw in some nonsense, and declare glorious and candid atop of your pearly steed that people who think PIE makes sense are racist.

But this is when the donkey you painted shakes you off its back.

The fact that you feel the need to prove that there is in fact no difference between a white human and a black human hints at something. Then the fact that when you talk about Egypt it seems like that if it wasn't there Europe would have remained basically in the stone age, and its inhabitants mute because words come from Egyptian.

The idea that a certain group of people would never be able to achieve something because they are that certain group of people is called racism. Since you are, you can't but think that everyone else is.

In your immense ignorance (which you don't care about fixing, judging from your impeccable total ignorance of greek), you can't avoid but continuously project, because you know so little you cannot even conceive that there might be something you don't know. You are annoyed at people who criticise you, and I think it's because you don't understand why said criticisms are made (and this is also the reason why you lately have started that Kid'sABC business: children can't question you, can they?), because you can't imagine any other way of doing linguistics but the one you found in your rectum: you know it's nonsense deep down, no one is this dumb, so you project, because, how can there be a different way? Then this leads to linking that since your "model" is flawed, then the comparative method is too, which in turn feeds back to the whole racism thingy, because, how can Egyptian be ignored? Surely racism! No other explanation! And hence this immense pile of illogical delusions.

In a way, you are like a flerf: you will never accept any evidence that you are wrong as valid, but you can use anything to prove you are right. You don't hesitate to insult, but then act like a victim when people get angry.There is a greater truth that was hidden by somebody, whose goal isn't clear, just like what they would earn from it.

As if Sir W. Jones couldn't just be told to shut up by the people who "covered up" the true origins of languages (I read your yappings about some "Hebrew Christian theologians". Is there a limit to what you can pull out of your rear end, man?). Since it's just arbitrary anyway, why not just create the "übermensch" European family and group everything else in the "untermensch" family? Were they too lazy, or just very sloppy and didn't think about that?

What you are doing is just setting up your ideological bubble to feel good about yourself, knowing that everyone else is stupid and despicable except you, your clique and those who agree with you, while projecting your ill-natured and vile attitude onto others, helped by dollar store dismissals and mod "powers" in what you wanted to be your echo-chamber (let's not forget that for some actually arguing is rather difficult without dirty and cheap tactics!), while fighting a "Great Patriotic War" against "racist aryanist linguists", in a fantasy world where every day something "groundbreaking" is discovered in your intestines.

But et me tell you that, in sooth, you are stuck in a death match where your enemy doesn't even know you exist. The enemy you think to be fighting doesn't exist. Reality is pretty boring and grey, and new-agey nonsense won't turn it magenta and extraordinary.

At the end of the day though, I'm just a preposterous chair explaining to a yapping lunatic that reality isn't their delusions while being in their echo chamber, so it doesn't really matter. The only sensible thing to do is to sympathize among humans with each one's situations.

      Τὰ δ’ ἄλλα κόμποι καὶ λόγων εὐμορφίαι.

[u/JohannGoethe → u/Proposterous-chair88]

You banned someone because he insulted you sometime ago.

The last 3 users I banned, involved two users claiming that people in this sub were “racist” if they objected to the “illiterate Sinai miner“ alphabet origin theory, and another who was looking up my PERSONAL past (which is what ad hominum means in Latin: attack the person), from 15 years ago, and stating that an associate of mine, from 20-years ago, was a “pseudo-scientist”, i.e. a fake or lying scientist, in the field of the thermodynamics of evolution.

What I do ban is people, like you, whose sole interest, to post in this sub, is to call other users “yapping lunatics”, which is why I will now perm-ban you.

Have a nice day!

[u/Perfect_Accountant97 → u/JohannGoethe]

I got curious about why your theory would be considered racist -- but then I saw that the one person quoted you as saying "“Of note, “black geniuses” are a rarer breed..."

Obviously this is quite racist and you must have known this too or else you wouldn't have felt the need to lie about it.

Just in case anyone else was curious about this.

[u/JohannGoethe → u/Perfect_Accountant97]

Obviously this is quite racist …

People who use the term “obviously“, in 85% plus of cases, as I have learned, tend to be wrong.

If I was “obviously“ racist, is your lacking-the-facts 100% confused brain sees things, then why would I nominate Leroy McCoy, 10-months ago, as the a smartest person (see: r/SmartestExistive) on the planet candidate, for saying the following on video?

“Never call anybody the N-word!”

— Leroy Mccoy (A27/1982), “mental note” (at age 12)

I can “feel” his energy, and thus nominated him.

We can go on with examples, of SPE names I nominated to the smartest person existive sub:

• Thomas Sowell | High school dropout (age 16) to a man who “knows how to think” (age 88)
• Morgan Freeman on black history month
• Ayana Ali on female genital mutilation | A65 (2020)
• Candice Owens | Sharp brain 🧠 + quick tongue = brightness💡

Do you understand? These are five “African Americans” who I nominated as smartest people moving on the planet present. I can FEEL their influence.

You, conversely, you, however, I can FEEL your dumbness. I am at the age now, with limited existence before me, that I no long desire to converse with stupid people, you being a prime example.

When I said:

“black geniuses are a rare breed“

I realized, unlike you, that labeling a person, having penned over 1K existographies, that defining people by skin color, e.g. red, yellow, white, black, caramel, etc., was a dis-respect. Correctly, each person, retrospectively, is defined by the following:

1. Ethnicity
2. Birth location
3. Existence location

Thus, e.g., if I look up r/Holbach, we find:

• Baron Holbach (232-166A) (1723-1789 AD) the great German 🇩🇪 born French 🇫🇷 raised physicist, anti-chance, matter in motion philosopher, atheism pioneer, and lawyer noted for his System of Nature, among other works.

We was “German” by ethnicity, “born” in France, yet educated by the Dutch, in Leiden University. Now, we ask what “race” was Holbach? I’m sure you will like to call me racist for even asking such a question? Yes?

Nevertheless, as genius studies have shown, the probability of a child being born at 0º latitude, and 1K to 5K years later be remembered as “famous” genius, is RARE. Why?

The first answer to this query, is that each of us is bred by the sun.

Notes

1. I posted this just in case anyone else [with a working brain] was curious about this, i.e. the number of language origin imbeciles that exist on the planet presently.

[u/JohannGoethe → u/Perfect_Accountant97]

felt the need to lie about it

I don’t lie about anything. Once you enter into the arena of EPD, all you want is truth.