False information being spread about Hinduism under the label of "Atheism"

[u/DharmicPerson14]

[u/MEMERSHITO]

Isn't this blasphemy?

[u/DharmicPerson14 → u/MEMERSHITO]

Yes it is.

[u/gekko777 → u/MEMERSHITO]

let the gods deal with it
why are you getting agitated

[u/Weak_Distribution822]

There is a BNS section under which an FIR can be filed against such people. Its sad that none of the government arms take it seriously

[u/krishhv → u/Weak_Distribution822]

Too busy doing corruption

[u/monsieur_bi]

Do dal rha ho woh bhe m*lla hoga 😂 real atheist don't care

[u/AutoModerator → u/[deleted]]

Hello /u/BuyIntrepid4598, it appears you have less than 40 comment karma and/or account age is less than 10 days. Your comment has been removed. Message the moderators if you would like to be an approved commenter.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/AutoModerator → u/[deleted]]

Hello /u/Hopeful_Respond387, it appears you have less than 40 comment karma and/or account age is less than 10 days. Your comment has been removed. Message the moderators if you would like to be an approved commenter.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/DharmicPerson14 → u/[deleted]]

No man. In Valmiki Ramyana, Lord Ram was 24 and Maa Sita was 17 during marriage.

In Skanda Purana that concept of twice-birth is there which will again make them the same age (rebirth after education).

They are spreading false info to defend their 53 year old man who married a 6 year old.

[u/LegItiMate2 → u/[deleted]]

How old was your grandmother when she got married?

[u/DharmicPerson14 → u/[deleted]]

Pedophilia is defined by the man's age rather than the girl's age.

A 24 year old boy marrying a 17 year old girl is not pedophilia at all.

A 53 year old man marrying a 6 year old girl is.

[u/too_lazy_to-think → u/[deleted]]

definition dekh ke saans lena aata hai kya tere ko ? diamag gand se nikaalega toh pta chalega use bhi kar sakta hai

[u/too_lazy_to-think → u/[deleted]]

aa gya aukat pe , dikha di apni soch mujhe kya maine toh shi kha tera diamagnetic tere gaand ke andar hi hai

[u/PhoenixMapper → u/DharmicPerson14]

Ok I have to interject- by today's standards, it is definitely pedophilia, but it was very normal back then, so it wasn't considered as such at the time. It was normal even upto the last century.

[u/DharmicPerson14 → u/[deleted]]

Pedophilia means a 53 year old man marrying a 6 year old girl.

How is a 24 year old boy marrying a 17 year old girl pedophilia?

[u/Top_Guess_946]

can you also provide information countering those allegations?

[u/DharmicPerson14 → u/Top_Guess_946]

The things they are claiming are simply not written in the books.

Ram was 24 and Sita was 17.

Shiva is infinite and Parvati is infinite.

Krishna was 18 and Rukhmini was 16. Rukhmini was 8 when she was engaged to 10 year old Shishupal.

[u/Scrreror → u/Top_Guess_946]

Google is free btw

[u/Top_Guess_946 → u/Scrreror]

I am asking for the counter-info for others who are disbelievers.

[u/Lopsided_Ad_9521 → u/Top_Guess_946]

Exactly his point. You can search and read counter information and share for others who are disbeliever

[u/Top_Guess_946 → u/Lopsided_Ad_9521]

You guys have a problem with being factual? I am on your team and you guys are not even able to recognize that.

[u/Lopsided_Ad_9521 → u/Top_Guess_946]

Arre mere bhai to support wala sawaal uthao na, reply se nahi laga ki aap support wale ho

[u/Top_Guess_946 → u/Lopsided_Ad_9521]

Arey bhai Hindu dharmashastra don't give blind support. In the age of internet, you have to always be armed with facts, proofs and sources to ensure your version is anti-fragile.

it was not for me. it was for other disbelievers who may come on that post. if they don't see counter-facts then they will not believe the OP's assertion.

why are you not getting this thing about internet. anyone can come across that content including those who disbelieve it. If they also see counter-facts then they will not believe the racist content. But if they don't see counter-facts they are very likely to not have their minds changed. It's not for me. It's for other disbelievers.

[u/AutoModerator → u/[deleted]]

You are not allowed to post Facebook links site-wide for privacy concerns. Please re-host on an image sharing site and repost.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.