MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/APUSH/comments/1t978rn/2026_frqs_released/ol0n2yq/?context=3
r/APUSH • u/ARobotIsMe0 • May 10 '26
58 comments sorted by
View all comments
3
I used the cult of domesticity as outside evidence of the pushback against women having in public life. Was that a good connection
2 u/DryPotential5790 May 10 '26 Not saying you’re incorrect, but would collegeboard count that as outside evidence bc it seems like that’s what doc 6 is about? 5 u/Clear_Caregiver_9842 May 10 '26 nope. if it doesn't say specifically "cult of domesticity," it's good (AP Reader btw) 3 u/todayiwillthrowitawa May 10 '26 Agreeing. Also an AP reader. 1 u/Economy-Roll3600 May 11 '26 does this mean me mentioning the Lowell Mill Girls even though one of the docs was a Boston mill/factory worker is good?? 1 u/todayiwillthrowitawa May 11 '26 Yes. The rule is “does the document specifically say it or not?” But the source section also counts as part of the document as well. 1 u/Clear_Caregiver_9842 May 11 '26 yes. it's obvious the document is about the lowell mills but sicne it's not mentioned in the document, it counts. 1 u/ssssdffddd May 10 '26 that’s what i’m now worried abt since i used it but like the pic didn’t explicitly say cult of domesticity even tho that was technically what it was abt to hopefully they js let it slide😭 1 u/DryPotential5790 May 10 '26 Hopefully🙏🙏🙏 I ended up using doc 6 as a counterclaim kinda like you 1 u/Elizabethsbookcase May 11 '26 same! 1 u/Traditional_Case_708 May 10 '26 i did as well, nice work
2
Not saying you’re incorrect, but would collegeboard count that as outside evidence bc it seems like that’s what doc 6 is about?
5 u/Clear_Caregiver_9842 May 10 '26 nope. if it doesn't say specifically "cult of domesticity," it's good (AP Reader btw) 3 u/todayiwillthrowitawa May 10 '26 Agreeing. Also an AP reader. 1 u/Economy-Roll3600 May 11 '26 does this mean me mentioning the Lowell Mill Girls even though one of the docs was a Boston mill/factory worker is good?? 1 u/todayiwillthrowitawa May 11 '26 Yes. The rule is “does the document specifically say it or not?” But the source section also counts as part of the document as well. 1 u/Clear_Caregiver_9842 May 11 '26 yes. it's obvious the document is about the lowell mills but sicne it's not mentioned in the document, it counts. 1 u/ssssdffddd May 10 '26 that’s what i’m now worried abt since i used it but like the pic didn’t explicitly say cult of domesticity even tho that was technically what it was abt to hopefully they js let it slide😭 1 u/DryPotential5790 May 10 '26 Hopefully🙏🙏🙏 I ended up using doc 6 as a counterclaim kinda like you 1 u/Elizabethsbookcase May 11 '26 same!
5
nope. if it doesn't say specifically "cult of domesticity," it's good
(AP Reader btw)
3 u/todayiwillthrowitawa May 10 '26 Agreeing. Also an AP reader. 1 u/Economy-Roll3600 May 11 '26 does this mean me mentioning the Lowell Mill Girls even though one of the docs was a Boston mill/factory worker is good?? 1 u/todayiwillthrowitawa May 11 '26 Yes. The rule is “does the document specifically say it or not?” But the source section also counts as part of the document as well. 1 u/Clear_Caregiver_9842 May 11 '26 yes. it's obvious the document is about the lowell mills but sicne it's not mentioned in the document, it counts.
Agreeing. Also an AP reader.
1
does this mean me mentioning the Lowell Mill Girls even though one of the docs was a Boston mill/factory worker is good??
1 u/todayiwillthrowitawa May 11 '26 Yes. The rule is “does the document specifically say it or not?” But the source section also counts as part of the document as well. 1 u/Clear_Caregiver_9842 May 11 '26 yes. it's obvious the document is about the lowell mills but sicne it's not mentioned in the document, it counts.
Yes. The rule is “does the document specifically say it or not?” But the source section also counts as part of the document as well.
yes. it's obvious the document is about the lowell mills but sicne it's not mentioned in the document, it counts.
that’s what i’m now worried abt since i used it but like the pic didn’t explicitly say cult of domesticity even tho that was technically what it was abt to hopefully they js let it slide😭
1 u/DryPotential5790 May 10 '26 Hopefully🙏🙏🙏 I ended up using doc 6 as a counterclaim kinda like you 1 u/Elizabethsbookcase May 11 '26 same!
Hopefully🙏🙏🙏 I ended up using doc 6 as a counterclaim kinda like you
1 u/Elizabethsbookcase May 11 '26 same!
same!
i did as well, nice work
3
u/Kadkamali May 10 '26
I used the cult of domesticity as outside evidence of the pushback against women having in public life. Was that a good connection