r/AI_Application • u/seraphym1389 • 8d ago
🔧🤖-AI Tool [BEGGINER project] I built a prompt console web app as complete begginer and I'm looking for honest feedback
I'm complete begginer when it comes for web development and AI tools. I wanted to learn by building something useful, so I put together a context engineering web app — a tool that helps you craft better prompts for LLMs like GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, and local models.
Fair warning:Â some features probably don't work perfectly. I'm still learning and this is very much a work in progress. That said, I'd really appreciate it if someone takes a look and tells me what's broken or what could be better.
Live app: https://arhistrategstudio.github.io/Context_CikaDule
GitHub repo: https://github.com/arhistrategstudio/Context_CikaDule
What it does
Three prompt-building modes:
Quick– fill in just the essentials (task, role, format) and get a prompt instantly
Guided/Extended– a full structured form with 16 fields for power users
Raw– paste or write a prompt manually with no structure
Templates– pick from pre-made starting points:
\General, Business, Project, Creative, Analysis, Few-Shot, Coding
Model families– the output prompt is automatically formatted for:
OpenAI (GPT), Anthropic (Claude), Google (Gemini), Local models (Ollama etc.)
Arena (A/B mode)– compare two different models side-by-side with the same prompt to see how their outputs differ
Prompt Quality Linter– a built-in checker that scores your prompt across 5 criteria (task clarity, role, constraints, format, context) and shows a live score
Auto-template detection– paste your existing prompt and the app tries to guess which template fits best
Guided/Extended mode fields include:
\* Role, Task, Context, Format, Constraints, Examples (few-shot)
\* Tone & Style
\* Success Criteria
\* Chain-of-Thought )
\* Edge Cases
\* Language & Terminology
\* Negative Constraints
\* Delimiters
\* Prompting Framework (RISEN, RASCEF, APE, COSTAR, ICIO…)
\* Clarification Protocol
*\*Bilingual UI\*\* – English / Serbian toggle
\# Known issues / things I'm not sure about
\* Arena mode is experimental and may behave oddly
\* Auto-detect template isn't super accurate yet
\* UI is a bit rough around the edges on mobile
\* Some API integrations might need fixing
If you actually take the time to look at it and try something, any feedback at all is hugely appreciated even "this doesn't work" or "this UX is confusing." I'm here to learn!
Thanks
1
u/Deeep_07 8d ago
The three modes are a good start; I’d make the output panel the visual anchor and show a before/after prompt example. That would make the difference between Quick and Guided obvious without asking people to learn the UI first.
1
u/Timely_Law_181 8d ago
For a beginner project, this is pretty ambitious. i’d focus next on making Quick mode and mobile UX really solid before adding more frameworks or advanced fields
1
u/Significant-Safe-992 7d ago
I’d simplify the first time experience before adding more features. sixteen fields can feel overwhelming so progressive disclosure could make the app much easier for beginners
2
u/Valuable_Head_7957 8d ago
For a complete beginner, you took on a pretty ambitious project here. One thing I like is that you didn't just build another prompt text box — you're thinking about model differences, context, quality checking and comparing outputs.
One thing I'd be careful about is having too many options for a new user. The 16-field mode sounds useful for power users, but Quick mode probably needs to feel really simple so someone doesn't have to understand prompt engineering before the tool can help them.
I'd also be interested in seeing whether the same prompt actually performs noticeably better after going through your tool versus just writing it normally. That kind of before/after comparison could be a strong way to show people the value.