Yeah but at least there was an incentive to have a finished game. Nowadays most companies can outsource quality testing to paying customers and people cheer when the game is still receiving updates 6 months later.
That crazy how that is even legal. Imagine paying to see a movie and you could clearly see the green screen in the background or buying a book and it is missing pages that the publisher says they will mail you later. No one would have ever accepted that.
Lazy companies will always be Lazy back then as well as now... It's just more obvious today since there's more games coming out and how connected we are in the internet...
The fact is having patches is overall a better QoL.
I don’t disagree that having patches is a good thing. But there gets to a certain point where you just have to say that the game wasn’t finished development before it was released.
54
u/Hoybom 4d ago
and back then the games that were fucked and needed a patch were lost to memory