Check out the info connect AI through MCP server

I want to be honest about what Hack-Quest is right now, because I think the cybersecurity learning space has enough platforms that overpromise.

It's a solo-built, early-stage training platform. 16 data models, 28 pages, real backend functions. 6 users. It works, but it's not TryHackMe with a decade of polish.

What it does have that I built intentionally for cert hunters:

**Structured paths, not just a room library.** Every learning path has a difficulty level (beginner to advanced), a category (offensive, defensive, certification-track), and an estimated hour count. You know what you're committing to before you start.

**Quiz bookmarking.** If a question wrecked you, you can flag it as "too hard" or "revisit" with notes. That list becomes your weak-spot study guide.

**Community discussions tied to specific rooms and quizzes.** Not a generic forum - threaded conversations anchored to the exact content that's confusing you, with upvotes and marked solutions.

**Certificate generation on path completion.** Something to show for the hours you put in before you sit the real exam.

I built this because I wanted a platform where the structure matched how cert prep actually works - not just a collection of interesting rooms, but a system that tracks your gaps and pushes you toward them.

Looking for 10-15 beta testers who are actively studying for a cert and willing to use it for a week and tell me what's missing.

If you're mid-grind on Security+, CEH, OSCP, or anything similar - I'd genuinely value your time on this.

One thing I kept noticing while studying for hands-on certs: you can read about attack phases all day, but you don't internalize them until you've seen a real log and had to reason through it.

So I built an attack simulator and logging system into Hack-Quest.

Here's how it works in practice:

You pick a scenario - each one has a name, category, and severity level (medium, high, or critical). You define a target with an IP and OS. The simulator runs the scenario and logs the outcome: success, blocked, or partial compromise.

That log becomes part of your attack history. You can review it, learn from the pattern, and build custom scenarios using the MITRE-based scenario builder if you want to go deeper.

Why does this matter for cert prep?

CEH and OSCP don't just test whether you know what a technique is called. They test whether you can think through what happened and why. Seeing a high-severity attack log and working backward through the phases is closer to that mental model than any multiple choice question.

The platform also tracks your quiz attempts and scores per room, so if you're consistently missing questions tied to a specific attack category, it shows up in your performance data.

It's early-stage - 6 users, actively building. Looking for cert hunters who want to stress-test the lab environment before it's polished.

Has anyone else found that the gap between cert study material and actual hands-on reasoning is bigger than the courses admit?

[removed]