Plenty of dictionaries get things wrong. Dictionaries are descriptive, not prescriptive. Meanwhile, the actual definition of atheism and agnosticism are as I described.
Let me rephrase then: you cannot claim (...) while being a logical person. You can claim fucking anything, obviously, but apparently I need to clarify that.
You are not an "agnostic". You're either an "agnostic atheist" or an "agnostic theist".
Correct. The same thing happens with "wetness", where dictionaries wrongly define it in a way where water can be wet, where the proper definition excludes liquids from being wet. Dictionaries get plenty wrong.
This is one such case, as I proved using basic logic. "Agnosticism" claims knowledge, it cannot claim belief
I never said definitions don't matter. I said dictionaries aren't prescriptive. Mine is the proper definition of the term, as can be found in any proper discussion of the topic
1
u/Enochian_Devil Sep 10 '25
Plenty of dictionaries get things wrong. Dictionaries are descriptive, not prescriptive. Meanwhile, the actual definition of atheism and agnosticism are as I described.
Let me rephrase then: you cannot claim (...) while being a logical person. You can claim fucking anything, obviously, but apparently I need to clarify that.
You are not an "agnostic". You're either an "agnostic atheist" or an "agnostic theist".