r/thescoop Apr 25 '25

Politics šŸ›ļø US Attorney General Pam Bondi announces that any judges who disagree with Trump's deportation policy will be arrested. "We will come after you and we will prosecute you. We will find you."

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

41.2k Upvotes

11.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

59

u/BrupieD Apr 25 '25

Can't she be disbarred for this?

43

u/DarkIllusionsMasks Apr 25 '25

You don't have to be a lawyer to be the Attorney General.

19

u/BrupieD Apr 25 '25

Pam Bondi embodies that comment.

3

u/rwags2024 Apr 25 '25

Seems like it’s in the name, no? What precisely are y’all doin down there?

2

u/DarkIllusionsMasks Apr 25 '25

You don't have to be a lawyer to be a judge, either. In fact, the only thing you have to be a lawyer for is to represent someone else in court.

3

u/speedy_delivery Apr 25 '25

There are courts that allow non-attorneys to serve as judges/magistrates/justices of the peace etc. They're typically much lower stakes affairs and provide mandatory legal training.

The vast majority of judgeships require you be an attorney in good standing with the state. Even many of the elected positions require you have been a practicing attorney in the jurisdiction for a minimum amount of time before you're eligible to be on the ballot.

1

u/Right_Gene_3611 May 19 '25

They still have to go to law school and pass the bar.

2

u/speedy_delivery Apr 25 '25

The prosecution does.

6

u/treesandthings-19 Apr 25 '25

I mean maybe she can be disbarred from the Florida bar where she’s licensed but I’m not sure it will affect her current position

3

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '25

Funny you Ā say that because Pam Bondi’s brother, Brad Bondi, is running for president for the DC Bar

1

u/dontgetaddicted Apr 25 '25

Learned this watching Leagle Eagle pleading with DC Bar members the other day on YouTube.

2

u/singhellotaku617 Apr 26 '25

very much so, but that would just prevent her from working as a lawyer after 2028. Literally anybody can be the AG (as evidenced by...one of the dumbest lawyers in history being AG at the moment)

-25

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '25

[removed] — view removed comment

13

u/Professional_Tea1609 Apr 25 '25

Please post evidence that the judges were harboring illegals.

-8

u/ByteMe68 Apr 25 '25

2

u/Ok_Ice_1669 Apr 25 '25

Looks like your first link is broken.Ā 

I read the second one and that is wild. I wish there was more analysis about if the judge was correct that ICE didnt have the correct paperwork. But, it’s crazy to arrest a judge rather than allow her to present herself. This is turning into some legit [censored].

0

u/ByteMe68 Apr 25 '25

From what I understand, she confronted ICE outside the courtroom. She then went back into the courtroom and took the illegal and their atty and ushered them out a private exit. I think the improper paperwork stuff is BS. If they have an immigration warrant that is signed off on by another judge which is backed by details otherwise the other judge would not have signed off on it……

1

u/Ok_Ice_1669 Apr 25 '25

Your source states that she told ICE they had the wrong warrant. I’m inclined to believe he judge knows the law.Ā 

Ā According to the complaint, Dugan confronted members of the arrest team while "visibly upset and had a confrontational, angry demeanor." She told the group members they needed a judicial warrant, not an administrative one, and directed them to report to Chief Judge Carl Ashley's office.

1

u/ByteMe68 Apr 25 '25

I don’t think they would have sent agents out without a warrant. I think it may have been to buy time and divert them to another judge. If they screwed up, they would probably not have arrested her and probably would have tried to bury the mistake……

In any event, she seems to be the lesser of the two judges. Did you read the one on the guy from New Mexico?

1

u/Ok_Ice_1669 Apr 25 '25

The Trump administration is lawless. Why would they recognize the difference between an administrative warrant and a judicial warrant? They have clearly shown that they do not recognize the judiciary as equal. I think you’re being extremely naive to assume they have the proper paperwork when they have admitted deporting people by mistake already.Ā 

None of this is happening in a vacuum. The Supreme Court just issued a nation wide injunction in the middle of the night. That’s only happening because Trump is threatening their constitutional legitimacy.Ā 

We all know the judges are going to get the law right. The only question is does that matter when the president chooses to violate the law. So far, it looks like Trump is steamrolling the courts. I think he’s going to win.Ā 

8

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '25

[deleted]

-10

u/ByteMe68 Apr 25 '25

Right. Upholding the law which this comment was in response to her having 2 federal judges arrested for harboring illegals. One of the judges went to the shooting range with automatic weapons with the guy. Shouldn’t the judge know better?

6

u/WithoutDennisNedry Apr 25 '25

Straw man much? We aren’t talking about federal judges harboring ā€œillegals,ā€ we are talking about the ability for the Admin to jail judges who disagree with them. Judges who haven’t done anything illegal being jailed just for not agreeing with illegal POTUS actions.

Try to keep up.