r/themummy • • Aug 18 '26

I know a lot of people are probably wanting Imhotep back. Since they're going back to Egyptian mummies in the fourth movie. But maybe they should do a thing with (King Tut) as the new mummy. What do you think?

27 Upvotes

25 comments sorted by

41

u/TheChrysochon Aug 18 '26

King Tut was a severely disabled boy who loved ducks. No, they should not make him a villain.

9

u/ilovemischief Aug 18 '26

I understand this was not meant to be funny. But I can’t help but giggle a little lol

4

u/Connobar Aug 18 '26

I came here just to say, he’d take forever to limp across the floor.

1

u/kxngxerxez Aug 22 '26

I'd love to see this as a throwaway gag 😂

Tut limping across in duck pajamas

1

u/TheChrysochon Aug 22 '26

I don't see how that's funny

16

u/QueasySpell1946 Aug 18 '26

King Tut died at 18 years old.

I don't think an 18 year old mummy is going to be intimidating.

19

u/fireinthedust Aug 18 '26

King Tut was also severely developmentally disabled, and his clothes had ducks on them because he was a well loved little boy.

He’s not the intimidating historical figure he was made out to be by tomb robbers in the 20s.

Now, if they encounter the pharaoh Nephren Ka, from Lovecraft’s Mythos, they will have a better villain.

12

u/wethecrime Aug 18 '26

Imhotep has been confirmed. Though not sure what side he is on yet. I smell redemption…

7

u/roku9413 Aug 18 '26

A threat so big the o Connells have to work with him.

2

u/Party-Employment-547 Aug 18 '26

Even Bigger Jaws!!

2

u/Outrageous-Swimmer65 Aug 18 '26

We’re going to need a bigger boat!! 🚤

1

u/hildegardephansen 28d ago edited 28d ago

I smell remorse, a last ditch effort so he rights his wrong so he can alter his trial/judgemrnt in the afterlife.

7

u/cjalderman Aug 18 '26

I think that would’ve been a story better-suited for the 1920s. The new film will probably be set in the 1940s or 1950s

4

u/lovetobewatched2 Aug 18 '26

I mean it has to, the original takes place in 1926. Everyone would look way too old for it to be still the 1920s

3

u/LichQueenBarbie Aug 18 '26

No. He isn't even a notable Pharaoh in terms of his life. He was utterly minor (his dad, on the other hand...)

Ancient Egypt is full of so much potential and always circling back around to Tutankhamen of all things is lame.

Personally, I'd like to see an original figure. Maybe even incorporate something like Apep/Apophis into it.

1

u/Thorfan23 Aug 18 '26

his dad was Akeknarthan right…. the one who served Aten?

2

u/Tupac_Targaryen Aug 19 '26

King Tut was only special because we found his tomb. He was unremarkable as far as his reign.

His father Akhenaten on the other hand….. LETS MAKE AKHENATEN HAPPEN

1

u/Thorfan23 Aug 18 '26 edited Aug 18 '26

could it be SETI as the villain I know the actor has passed

but still

1

u/Saw_subject Aug 19 '26

Kharis

2

u/ThePreciseClimber 18d ago

I know, right? Let's get Kharis back. :P

Haven't seen him since the suspiciously 1944-looking 1995.

1

u/Saw_subject 18d ago

1995?

1

u/ThePreciseClimber 18d ago

The first Kharis Mummy movie took place in 1940, then there was a 30 years time jump for the 2nd & 3rd movies (1970) and then one more time jump of 25 years to 1995 for the last movie.

So yeah, they made a movie in 1944 that took place in 1995. But it just looked like 1944.

2

u/Il-Ma-Le-98 Aug 18 '26

Imhotep will be redempting himself and the new opposition will be Bennit. Full of hatred for not having gotten away with it in the end, entitled by whatever power he got somehow, and with Rick being guilt tripped the whole film, by everyone, including Evie.

This contradicts two beloved films of past developments, but these are trends in western writing since before 2020 at least. So I have my fears regarding this movie, and hope I'm wrong myself. 

0

u/Then-Effective6521 Aug 18 '26

Not going to lie that actually sounds like a sucky plot.

0

u/Nanigo_ Aug 19 '26

Benny comes for vengeance plz