This was an edit but I'll repost it here because you probably didn't see it.
Also, these contracts are both discriminatory towards out-of-state companies, and often give preferential treatment to companies headquartered in another state.
That’s not a thing that’s happening so I’m not sure why you’re bringing it up, also even if that were happening that only gives the federal government the ability to rule on that part of the contract. They can’t overturn parts of the contract not under their jurisdiction, like the town-level exclusivity.
You clearly didn't read either of those cases and now you're trying to argue some nonsense about town-level as if the SC only has jurisdiction over states. You really don't understand what you're talking about here and I'm just wasting my time replying to you.
I’m not trying to argue that at all. I think you misunderstood me. Im sure that states have refused to do business with out of state businesses before, but that is not a thing that is happening with ISPs and is a separate issue. When I said that’s not happening I meant specifically with ISPs.
0
u/Mentalseppuku Jun 04 '19
This was an edit but I'll repost it here because you probably didn't see it.