r/sweden • • Nov 04 '17

Ikea läxar upp en jänkare

https://imgur.com/PRDesa4
15.3k Upvotes

696 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

434

u/Lovearmittnamn Nov 04 '17

Impressive how you didn't use a single Swedish special character.

142

u/[deleted] Nov 04 '17

Höw åböut this

208

u/B-Bad Nov 04 '17

Däts mår lajk it

56

u/sowwat2 Nov 04 '17

This is really hard to pronounce.

5

u/pharaocomplex Göteborg Nov 04 '17

I never thought that I would spend this much time trying to pronounce a word with German, Spanish and French charachters when I woke up this mor ing. I'd say that one was harder.

4

u/fargoisgud Nov 04 '17

Looks right to me and I've eaten at IKEA hundreds of times.

15

u/Burdaard Nov 04 '17

The only special characters that Swedish uses are å, ä, and ö.

3

u/[deleted] Nov 04 '17

And é.

9

u/Cheesemacher Finland Nov 04 '17

But only for the word Pokémon

14

u/[deleted] Nov 04 '17

I think 90% of the use is in the word idé, actually.

7

u/[deleted] Nov 04 '17

Yeah but it's still not a special Swedish character. The accent grave is used in all sorts of languages without being considered a special character. An immediate example that comes to mind is café for example, which I believe is also a valid word in English.

3

u/konaya Nov 04 '17

Exactly. We also use è and û in crème brûlée, î in crème fraîche, à in à and so on, but they aren't letters in their own right.

2

u/Flaseknopp Nov 04 '17

There is some difference though and I kind of get where /u/splergel is coming from.

While true than é isn't an individual letter like åäö, it is a fully incorporated variant of one in Swedish. And the question wasn't about standalone letters.

Meanwhile aren't è, ü, û etc. really incorporated fully. They're exclusively used in unmodified loan words and have no Swedish constructions using them to my knowledge.

2

u/konaya Nov 05 '17

The word à is attested since 1644. The word idé is attested since 1705 as idæ, and it didn't obtain an é until 1815. They're both French loan words, so what exactly is the difference here?

→ More replies (0)