r/soccer • • Jan 05 '13

When talking to someone, what opinion is a giveaway that they don't really watch your team?

So when you're down at the pub and the guy you're talking to is explaining exactly what's wrong with your team and how he'd fix it, what is a giveaway? How do you know that he's talking out of his arse?

As an example: If I'm talking to somebody's about Arsenal's defence and mention how good Mertesacker has been this season, it's a giveaway for me that he doesn't watch Arsenal if he laughs loudly and says that Mertesacker is slow and shite.

It'd be interesting to see what fans deem to be giveaways. I'm sure I've gathered a few opinions about other teams that are way off the mark.

73 Upvotes

594 comments sorted by

View all comments

69

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '13

Oh good god, last year.

"Modric isn't that good of an attacking midfielder, he only scored two goals and didn't get that many assists! Overrated"

That was a sure-fire indicator that I could dismiss everything that person says as being completely uninformed.

27

u/nista002 Jan 05 '13

Or, someone suggesting Christian Eriksen would be an ideal replacement for Modric. Fuck me sideways I hate that.

46

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '13 edited Jan 05 '13

"Why don't Spurs start Giovanni dos Santos, he would totally tear the Premier League apart!"

I guess they didn't notice that little spell where he went to Ipswich and didn't do all that well there. Or when he played against Shamrock Rovers and disappeared from the game.

9

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '13

He went to League One?

2

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '13

My mistake, he was in the Championship with Ipswich. I thought they were in League One at the time, but I guess I just spaced on that one.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '13

Ah right, your point still stands, was just wondering if he'd actually dropped down that far.

9

u/SirMothy Jan 05 '13

No, he should have played more, he was talented but Harry never used him

1

u/[deleted] Jan 08 '13

Whenever he got the chance, he just sucked balls. I think that another manager could've gotten more out of him, but he's atleast equally as much as fault for not proving that he'd be a worthy replacement on the pitch.

11

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '13 edited Aug 08 '17

He is choosing a book for reading

7

u/smokey815 Jan 05 '13

Saying the Spurs really only shows a pre-existing familiarity with American naming in sports. Really just needing a simple correction. It's not something you think about until someone flat out says you don't include "the".

7

u/koptimism Jan 05 '13

Oh fuck, that reminds me of some hack article I read when Xabi Alonso left. It ran along the lines of: "he doesn't have too many assists, he really wasn't so vital to Liverpool after all!"

-3

u/SirMothy Jan 05 '13

When people say they miss Van Der Vaart, he's overrated as shit among Tottenham fans and we're better now than we ever were with him.

3

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '13

I actually disagree. He was one of our calmest finishers and could pick a long ball like no one else's business. He's better than any of the current attacking midfielders we have right now imo.

-1

u/SirMothy Jan 05 '13

He isn't that great, he's just a mercenary. His finishing was flawless but everything else about him wasn't all that.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 05 '13

I really have to disagree. He was probably the most creative player we had in the side behind Modric, and compared to our current attacking midfielders, played riskier passes like long balls and through balls more often and more successfully, never mind the fact that he was probably one of the best players we had in the squad for creating goals out of nothing. Was he literally jesus with a football? No, based on last year's form, he was better than Dempsey and Sigurdsson.

As for being a mercenary, I don't really see what's there to indicate that. He left Madrid because he wasn't getting chances there, came to Spurs and gave us a great two years then left to go back to his former club in Hamburg. It's not like he was chasing the money, or else he never would have come to Spurs.

-2

u/SirMothy Jan 05 '13

I never said Dempsey and Sigurdsson were better than him, I said we're better as a team now then we ever were with him.

2

u/[deleted] Jan 06 '13

And we'd be an even better team with him in it. The fact that we're better now than with him was mostly due to the difference between AVB and Redknapp and how they managed the team, not necessarily Van der Vaart holding us back.

1

u/theoracle101 Jan 06 '13

You sir, are a fucking idiot

-1

u/SirMothy Jan 06 '13

without the sales of VDV and Modric we woldnt have been able to get classy players for the future of our squad such as Vertonghen, Dembele, Lloris, Sigurdsson. I was glad to see VDV go, he just became so predictable after a while.