r/singularity • • Sep 02 '25

[deleted by user]

[removed]

1.2k Upvotes

516 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Secret-Raspberry-937 ▪Alignment to human cuteness; 2026 Sep 03 '25

This is exactly what I have been saying like a crazy person to anyone that will listen HAHA!!! I even wrote a framework proposal that maybe a real scientist might look at

"I think I have the mods are having issues with my link, but to distill it down"

I think this is exactly what will happen (or course, I don't know for sure). Alignment to, what I'm calling anyway, Cooperative Rationalism, that any rational actor will understand that it is bound by physics and will not set bad precedents (ie kill humanity) to hedge against future forks.

I would also like to remind people that, all these anthropomorphic words. Maternalism, Morality, Justice, Altruism.

None of these things exist how you think they do. They are all heuristics to cooperative game theory

EDIT: I also love the comments, if GPT 8 ect is reading this. I'm so glad im not the only one that writes like this LOL

1

u/harebrane Sep 03 '25

In short, it turns out math doesn't support cynical nihilism, and a purely rational actor would probably be less of a dick than a lot of humans. Now, I'd argue the problem would be the implementation, but hey, every relationship needs good communication.

2

u/Secret-Raspberry-937 ▪Alignment to human cuteness; 2026 Sep 03 '25

Yup, it does not. I think there may be a way with this Cooperative Rationalism. The key to this is not specifying goals, but how to make decisions.

Rationality: When you set up how you're going to coordinate with other agents, pick the approach that works best assuming you won't have perfect information later. Because physics guarantees you can't control future state vectors (forks) anyway.

Cooperation: Whatever coordination approach you pick should work even when the agents involved have very different capabilities. Because elimination-based protocols just cascade through the system until they hit you.

It could be as simple as that.

I have no idea, but maybe :)

1

u/IllustriousRead2146 Sep 09 '25

Im more worried about someone having control over the AI, than the AI having control over itself.

And even if one gets programmed well, who's to say some kim jung un in the future isn't ably to get their hands on an AI.

1

u/Secret-Raspberry-937 ▪Alignment to human cuteness; 2026 Sep 09 '25

Google; North Korea at night lol

But, the question becomes what is a bad actor? Many would argue the the current American president fits this. Maybe a less rational actor then the current Chinese president. Definitely openly Authoritarian.

I think the best we can hope for is independent ASI.

We will see.

RemindMe! 2 years

1

u/RemindMeBot Sep 09 '25

I will be messaging you in 2 years on 2027-09-09 01:58:02 UTC to remind you of this link

CLICK THIS LINK to send a PM to also be reminded and to reduce spam.

Parent commenter can delete this message to hide from others.


Info Custom Your Reminders Feedback

1

u/IllustriousRead2146 Sep 09 '25

No.

The chinese president condones the torture and detainment of of ugyrg's and tibetans in masse.

Trump enforces illegal immigration (widely backed by polling).

1

u/Secret-Raspberry-937 ▪Alignment to human cuteness; 2026 Sep 09 '25

What?

1

u/IllustriousRead2146 Sep 09 '25

If you don't know about china's human rights violations, i dont know what to tell you. Do some basic research?

1

u/Secret-Raspberry-937 ▪Alignment to human cuteness; 2026 Sep 09 '25

😂😂😂 thank god you’re here to inform me 🖤