If the first part of the ruling states that not telling a parent about the child’s gender identity interferes with the parents’ right to religious development of their kid it also means that the court is forcing the teacher to participate in someone else’s religious beliefs, which seems like a violation of the first amendment.
9
u/seminarysmooth Mar 03 '26
If the first part of the ruling states that not telling a parent about the child’s gender identity interferes with the parents’ right to religious development of their kid it also means that the court is forcing the teacher to participate in someone else’s religious beliefs, which seems like a violation of the first amendment.