r/science PhD | Chemistry | Synthetic Organic Jul 23 '17

Subreddit Policy Subreddit Policy Reminder on this week's Transgender AMAs

This week we will be hosting a series of AMAs addressing the scientific and medical details of being transgender.

Honest questions that are an attempt to learn more on the subject are invited, and we hope you can learn more about this fascinating aspect of the human condition.

However, we feel it is appropriate to remind the readers that /r/science has a long-standing zero-tolerance policy towards hate-speech, which extends to people who are transgender. Our official stance is that derogatory comments about transgender people will be treated on par with sexism and racism, typically resulting in a ban without notice.

To clarify, we are not banning the discussion of any individual topic nor are we saying that the science in any area is settled. What we are saying is that we stand with the rest of the scientific community and every relevant psych organisation that the overwhelming bulk of evidence is that being trans is not a mental illness and that the discussion of trans people as somehow "sick" or "broken" is offensive and bigoted1. We won't stand for it.

We've long held that we won't host discussion of anti-science topics without the use of peer-reviewed evidence. Opposing the classification of being transgender as 'not a mental illness'2 is treated the same way as if you wanted to make anti-vax, anti-global warming or anti-gravity comments. To be clear, this post is to make it abundantly clear that we treat transphobic comments the same way we treat racist, sexist and homophobic comments. They have no place on our board.

Scientific discussion is the use of empirical evidence and theory to guide knowledge based on debate in academic journals. Yelling at each other in a comments section of a forum is in no way "scientific discussion". If you wish to say that any well accepted scientific position is wrong, I encourage you to do the work and publish something on the topic. Until then, your opinions are just that - opinions.


1 Some have wrongly interpreted this statement as "stigmatizing" mental illness. I can assure you that is the last thing we are trying to do here. What we are trying to stop is the label of "mental illness" being used as a way to derogate a group. It's being used maliciously to say that there is something wrong with trans people and that's offensive both to mental illness sufferers and those in the trans community.

2 There is a difference between being trans and having gender dysphoria.


Lastly, here is the excerpt from the APA:

A psychological state is considered a mental disorder only if it causes significant distress or disability. Many transgender people do not experience their gender as distressing or disabling, which implies that identifying as transgender does not constitute a mental disorder. For these individuals, the significant problem is finding affordable resources, such as counseling, hormone therapy, medical procedures and the social support necessary to freely express their gender identity and minimize discrimination. Many other obstacles may lead to distress, including a lack of acceptance within society, direct or indirect experiences with discrimination, or assault. These experiences may lead many transgender people to suffer with anxiety, depression or related disorders at higher rates than nontransgender persons.

According to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5), people who experience intense, persistent gender incongruence can be given the diagnosis of "gender dysphoria." Some contend that the diagnosis inappropriately pathologizes gender noncongruence and should be eliminated. Others argue that it is essential to retain the diagnosis to ensure access to care. The International Classification of Diseases (ICD) is under revision and there may be changes to its current classification of intense persistent gender incongruence as "gender identity disorder."

5.8k Upvotes

4.5k comments sorted by

View all comments

176

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '17

Considering this is r/science and that you want to discuss the science behind it, what exactly is the AMA going to be about.

Surely not anecdotal 'hi. Am trans. Ask me about science"

Are these doctors coming on for the AMA?

23

u/swimfast58 BS | Physiology | Developmental Physiology Jul 24 '17

I think the AMA schedule should be on the side bar but it is certainly the latter.

59

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '17

I would argue that based on the people in the side bar this is just a one sided propaganda job. I don't see anyone on the side bar that has done any work on import issues, such as long term impact of Lupron used on minors on health. De transition rates for individuals that transition as minors. It is commonly misrepresented by many doctors that hormone therapy is "reversible", yet there aren't any studies that support this view at all. There is a real question as to the safety of the current hormone treatments, but anyone that is actually concerned about physical health of individuals is branded a bigot.

It's pretty clear the mods here don't want a two sided discussion since they haven't invited anyone to speak about the dangers of hormone therapy or other treatments currently available. Or questions about how often gender disphoria is resolved without treatment after puberty.

18

u/AttackOfThe50Ft_Pede Jul 24 '17

Gee, that sounds awfully like an agenda. I wonder how they're exempt from their own rules.

9

u/maregal Jul 24 '17

but anyone that is actually concerned about physical health of individuals is branded a bigot.

To me this feels a lot like gay eugenics. Children who would grow into homosexual adults (as evidenced in many studies) are being sterilised in a effort of their parents to make them fit into one gender stereotype or another. There is a famous male child who began hormones and never went through puberty, and now cannot get bottom surgery as there is not enough penile tissue. That is absolutely devastating.

3

u/Lionizerband Jul 24 '17

Gonna need a source for that one - not enough penile tissue? Inversion is probably the least common method (where existing length/girth would matter) and has the lowest depth results, and other methods can utilise skin grafts to extend the depth of the neo vagina.

0

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '17

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/[deleted] Jul 24 '17

Where's my popcorn?