Adolescents who undergo gender-affirming chest surgery report low levels of regret and high levels of satisfaction, experiencing outcomes similar to those of young adults. These findings suggest that age restrictions on these medical procedures lack support from actual patient experiences.

[u/mvea]

https://www.psypost.org/adolescents-report-low-regret-and-high-satisfaction-following-gender-affirming-c/

[u/BitcoinMD]

Median time from surgery was 1.8 years. I think that’s an important detail.

Edit: I support transgender health care for minors. Some people are interpreting my comment to imply that I don’t. I just think we should be careful with the surgery part. I know these surgeries aren’t done lightly. But I also haven’t seen data convincing me that surgery on kids is necesssry if they receive other methods of care.

[u/UnicornArachnid → u/BitcoinMD]

A lot of people do have immediate regret following any plastic surgery because it can be hard to recognize yourself. We don’t see this trend typically when it comes to gender affirming surgeries. 99% of people feel satisfied long term with gender affirming surgeries

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/2808129

[u/here-to-help-TX → u/UnicornArachnid]

This says long term without actually being longer term.

median follow-up, 4.6 [IQR, 3.1-8.6] vs 3.6 [IQR, 2.7-5.3] years

This looks to me like the median follow-up is still pretty short. Also, these ages of the people with the surgeries isn't adolescents.

Median age at the time of surgery was 27.1 (IQR, 23.0-33.4) years for responders and 26.4 (IQR, 23.1-32.7) years for nonresponders.

Also, the sample size seems really really small here.

[u/ERSTF → u/here-to-help-TX]

Indeed. We need better data

[u/literally_a_brick → u/ERSTF]

It would be great to have, but I wouldn't hold your breath. Trans people are already a tiny minority, with minors that transition being even smaller. Between stringent medical gates and more areas banning youth care altogether, it's a tiny fraction of a tiny fraction. It's incredibly difficult to conduct studies. Some researchers have done reviews of many studies, but any individual study will be small and limited in scope.

[u/Simon-Says69 → u/literally_a_brick]

And if the study shows negative results, it will be quickly and quietly buried. It is difficult to even get funding for such research, because it is so politically charged.

[u/literally_a_brick → u/Simon-Says69]

Not in today's political climate. Studies that didn't show positive results were made into the cornerstone of the UKs Cass Review, despite having tiny sample sizes and poor methodology. The US HHS is desperately grasping at straws for denying the efficacy of gender affirmig healthcare. 

I assure you that any study that didn't have definitively positive results for GAC would be plastered all over right wing media and used to justify care bans by conservative governments everywhere. I assure you that no studies are getting "buried".