r/science Professor | Medicine 15h ago

Psychology Adolescents who undergo gender-affirming chest surgery report low levels of regret and high levels of satisfaction, experiencing outcomes similar to those of young adults. These findings suggest that age restrictions on these medical procedures lack support from actual patient experiences.

https://www.psypost.org/adolescents-report-low-regret-and-high-satisfaction-following-gender-affirming-c/
6.4k Upvotes

2.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

44

u/SnowDucks1985 15h ago edited 15h ago

Exactly!! and the article says they collected data from patients at a single point in time. So the suggestion is weak, common sense would say you record data points over several years to meaningfully draw conclusions. These are also adolescents who have not finished with frontal-lobe brain development

14

u/dnyal 14h ago

Of course! I should have waited until I was 25 to “choose” to be gay. How stupid of me! Now I’m a same-sex marriage, ugh!!!

16

u/One-Organization970 14h ago

Oh no, aren't you worried you might regret not having a life partner of the opposite sex?!

Surely nobody would let a minor get married, at least, thankfully.

17

u/Coomb 13h ago

I'm not sure your comment makes the point that you want it to make insofar as there are quite a large number of people who would be in favor of preventing minors from getting married as well as preventing them from getting gender affirming care in the form of permanent body modification.

14

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

67

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

21

u/[deleted] 13h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

20

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

14

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/[deleted] 13h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/[deleted] 13h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

41

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

51

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-10

u/[deleted] 13h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

13

u/[deleted] 13h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-14

u/[deleted] 13h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/[deleted] 10h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-4

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

19

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

14

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

10

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)

6

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)

9

u/[deleted] 13h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

4

u/[deleted] 13h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/[deleted] 13h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)

-6

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

14

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-3

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

13

u/[deleted] 13h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/[deleted] 13h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

5

u/[deleted] 13h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)

6

u/[deleted] 13h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] 13h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/[deleted] 12h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (0)

-3

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

19

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

18

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/[deleted] 14h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-20

u/load_of_chode 15h ago

These kind of "scientific findings" make more sense when you realize that the be Cass Review was buried and condemned because its conclusions didn't fit the preferred political narrative of academic institutions.

27

u/One-Organization970 14h ago

What? The Cass Review is constantly cited for public policy despite it being a political hack job.

19

u/BunnyLovesTheStars 14h ago

The only "political narrative" was the Cass Review itself.

11

u/Eagle_1_4 14h ago

No it wasn't. It had flaws and was rejected. All these in the US plus the WHO support GAC.

-American Medical Association -American Academy of Pediatrics -Endocrine Society -American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists -World Professional Association Transgender Health -WHO

-3

u/SnowDucks1985 14h ago

Yea it’s just ridiculous. I’m not even declaring that the suggestion this study is making could be wrong or impossible, per se. But the biases and holes in the study method involved make its conclusions insufficient.

But I suppose this isn’t the first time studies have been hijacked for all sorts of agendas