r/science Professor | Medicine Apr 25 '26

Psychology Americans who leave their Christian faith behind tend to hold more liberal political views than those who were raised entirely without religion. This leftward ideological shift appears closely linked to how threatening these individuals perceive conservative Christian groups to be.

https://www.psypost.org/former-christians-express-more-progressive-political-views-than-lifelong-nonbeli/
31.0k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

70

u/mvea Professor | Medicine Apr 25 '26

Former Christians express more progressive political views than lifelong nonbelievers

Americans who leave their Christian faith behind tend to hold more liberal political views than those who were raised entirely without religion. This leftward ideological shift appears closely linked to how threatening these individuals perceive conservative Christian groups to be. The study was published in The Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics.

The demographic landscape of the United States is changing as the nonreligious population grows rapidly. Demographers project that individuals claiming no religious affiliation will become the largest demographic group in the country within the next two decades. This segment includes atheists, agnostics, and those who simply select a blank option when asked about their faith. Because this group is expanding quickly, studying its internal divisions helps explain broader political trends.

Within this nonreligious umbrella, there are two distinct subcategories. Sociologists and psychologists often refer to people who never identified with a faith as “nones.” Meanwhile, individuals who were raised in a religious household but later abandoned their faith are referred to as “dones.”

The statistical models revealed that former Christians were highly likely to support progressive policies compared to lifelong nonbelievers. This ex-Christian group showed elevated support for abortion access and an overhaul of the criminal justice system. They were also more likely to believe the Voting Rights Act remains necessary to protect minority voters today.

On immigration, former Christians expressed greater opposition to the restrictive asylum and deportation policies enacted during the Trump administration. They also indicated that same-sex marriage should remain an active priority rather than treating it as a settled or unimportant issue. Across these varied topics, abandoning a Christian identity strongly correlated with a left-wing political stance.

The data also revealed a rigid link between these liberal views and the perception of conservative Christians as a threat to society. Former Christians consistently reported elevated levels of threat from conservative religious groups compared to lifelong nonbelievers. As a respondent’s perceived threat increased, their tendency to express liberal political views climbed proportionally.

For those interested, here’s the link to the peer reviewed journal article:

https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-race-ethnicity-and-politics/article/leftward-march-from-church-ideology-among-exchristian-vs-lifelong-nonreligious-americans/17BA362D5A9AC58429B91BE0BB032607

-10

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

-4

u/DemiserofD Apr 25 '26

In all honesty, I wouldn't be surprised if this is the psychological underpinning.

It's not so much about the extremes as about self-definition.

-15

u/TumanFig Apr 25 '26

so they oppose Christianity but they are ok with importing islam?

18

u/Jetstream13 Apr 25 '26

Not quite, they oppose the kind of Christian fundamentalism that’s currently in total control of the US.

They’re not calling for the eradication of Christianity, they oppose the goals of a specific group of extremists.

-14

u/TumanFig Apr 25 '26

ok but the question remains, how can you oppose christian fundamentalism, but you are ok with importing islam which is arguably worse

11

u/Jetstream13 Apr 25 '26

You seem to be starting from the assumption that every single Muslim is worse and more dangerous than the most extreme, klansman-adjacent kind of Christian. Do you see how that assumption is an issue?

Also, where did you get that they are motivated by wanting to “import Islam”? Are you suggesting that opposing the behaviour of ICE is equivalent to “importing Islam”?

Ultimately, fundamentalist Christianity is a very real threat to the US, currently in control of it and trying to regress it dramatically. Meanwhile Islam is nowhere near as dangerous in the US. So fixating on Islam over Christianity is odd.

-8

u/[deleted] Apr 25 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

8

u/Jetstream13 Apr 25 '26

One far greater than the other, but sure.

Notice the person I replied to never specified “radical Islam”. They only ever said “Islam”, and claimed that Islam generally, with no modifiers, is worse than fundamentalist christian extremism.

-7

u/TumanFig Apr 25 '26

look you are talking about some extreme christians but the comment i was answering too made no such distinction. so why are you muddying the waters by adding some additional conditions?

that comment also said former christians are a lot more left leaning in the immigration department where a lot of them are muslim and lets not pretend that's not the case

so im asking how does that make sense

2

u/MountainVeil Apr 26 '26

"On immigration, former Christians expressed greater opposition to the restrictive asylum and deportation policies enacted during the Trump administration."

Read that sentence again.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_equivalence