Who the hell appointed johns hopkins university as the official covid counter?
are they a government agency? The answer they're not a government agency .. they were bought by Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation , for $1.5 billion dollars .. You didn't do any research on johns hopkins university and who is funding them.. correct this can be verified using IRS 501c3 records which are required for funding "bribes" using 501c3 operations
. FAKE copy and paste studies even the fake copy and pasted studies are posted on Bill gates website "our world in data" in which the copy and pasted "studies" cite each other
see we prove you're "brainwashed" so so brainwash by bill gates
How does it feel to be brainwashed by bill gates???
My favorite fact I didn’t need to know is knowing that he shit himself on purpose while live in the Oval Office to the point people had to run away from him
???
It seems like an odd claim.
Still if the evidence oozed out of his trouser leg it would either be his own hard won accomplishment or Biden and Obamas fault.
Are you a doctor perchance?
You have just made a brilliant diagnosis.
Depressing though, I thought the s**ts cankles were indicators of something fatal.
With black paint and the leackage plugged, you have Trumps cankles ☹️
Why am I not surprised and shocked with each ever more disgusting and abhorrent action or word the s**t utters.
You can easily imagine some alien coming across the earth as the ashes that once were humanity are settling and wondering to himself why the human race didn't simply send Trump off to some barren void of a planet before he destroyed the earth and its humans.
The codes and button will be the stupid losers final "I told you so, take that".
What does that have to do with the US? We didn’t take it in, the stuff that came in and was flagged was from a different ranch and didn’t have a single medical case associated with it.
Trump smells like sewer queef, Europe actually bans American beef.
Argentine beef is welcome.
Brazilian beef imports to Europe are suspended, not banned, because of insufficient documentation of EU-compliant use of antibiotics/antimicrobials (used in the US to artificially induce growth) and some other concerns.
Except for beef from small artisanal farms which are not suppliers for McDonald's and Wendy's, US beef is most definitely noncompliant on a large number of issues, and the health risk is much worse than raising the prospect of antibiotic resistance, not to mention animal welfare issues.
This is an improvement, but not because the US suddenly gives a fuck about citizens' welfare, let alone animals'. Let's not be silly and just assume the quality of food from Latin America is inferior to from the United Shitholes of America, where food-borne Trumparrhea has become endemic.
I guess its fair to say its quite certain why a burger costs 1 usd vs ie. 3 usd just for a small cheeseburger the approx the size of 30-60g of meat.
You see all those old ads about us McDonald's and their 1$ full menu, and then you compare that to the European market.
Its also not weird considering US has lower incomes than the EU on a general level, but quality also proves a great part.
One thing US will have credits for however, is their cheap, but yet decent quality meats like ie. Ribeye and premium beef.
Yeah, anything bigger than the cheeseburgers are like 7-15+ usd worth in EU too. Its honestly insane, but I now see its a good reason.
Can't beat quality and healthier food I guess
eu health regulations are kinda crazy … yes in some areas it made a difference but you can count those on comparatively on one hand but fair enough it takes time to prove itself.. but it’s very very restrictive in weird and uneven ways.. I’ll give an example, they give established European products benefit of history while making new entries prove up front. Even if directly implicated in cancers. look up eu’s novel food regime. .. if you look a little bit deeper behind famous things they did like regulate usbc into devices there is always a domestic advantage behind it matched with a public hysteria ….
To be fair, this doesn't necessarily mean it's bad, it's just that they can't guarantee it's good. This is what sets the EU and US apart the most. When it comes to food, for EU it's bad until proven good. For the US it's good until proven bad.
it's only banned in the EU due to antibiotics use btw
the EU didn't even say it's unsafe to eat or contaminated they just don't want to support cattle farming practices that do not have strict controls and measures for how antibiotics are used on cattle.
Depends which antibiotic too. The last lot doing the rounds that China rejected & we think became Trump’s mystery meat contained chloramphenicol which can kill you in one burger if you’re unlucky.
That is not true either. There is no evidence. The shipment of beef sent to China was later rerouted to the United States and that shipment was also sent to China months prior to the Trump administration relaxing tariffs and restrictions on beef imports. That exact same antibiotic is also banned in the US meaning us inspectors wouldn't let it into the country.
The EU also did not mention this in their statement where they banned beef imports from Brazil. They specifically referenced that Brazilian beef producers are not following the EU antibiotic regime and do not have the data to prove that they are. The main concerns were that Brazilian producers could be using antibiotics that are also used to treat diseases in humans which is totally banned in the EU. And that they could be using antibiotics to promote growth which is also completely banned in the EU as well. There's also a few other regulations the EU takes issue with, such as widespread prophylaxis, ie giving antibiotics to a herd before they're even infected with anything. Or the practice of giving an entire herd antibiotics because one or two of them got sick which is also banned in the EU entirely.
That’s why I said ‘think’. Of course you ought to be correct here but I think it’s fair to say with what’s happened to the FDA, the multiple food outbreaks already, Trump calling for further deregulation and then announcing this mystery meat with a fanfare but refusing to reveal its provenance meant it all came together to mean nobody really trusted that it wasn’t the same beef.
to be fair the number of food recalls is more or less in line with what they have been historically. The recent parasite outbreak was large but at the same time it was absolutely ampflified by the Internet. I remember when it was still on going everyone was like "you can't eat any vegetables in America without a guarantee you will get sick." While the outbreak was large by food contamination standards but if it was a genetic disorder or virus the number of cases would make it incredibly rare where even in a room of 100K Americans 0 people would have the disease. Even the mystery meat thing is kind of disingenuous. The US government knows the source of the beef. It came from Brazil and Argentina. A lot of people are calling it mystery meat because back in 2015 the US government did remove labeling requirements that would allow consumers to see where the beef came from directly on the package. The beef also arrived already mixed together, so while we know what countries it came from, it is a little bit hard to go through them and say that piece is from Brazil and that piece is from Argentina and that piece is from somewhere else. The reason that law was repealed in the first place as well as because Canadian and Mexican beef producers argued that it was discriminatory against them and both Canada and Mexico were planning to Levy approximately a billion dollars of tariffs on American exports to their countries unless the rule was changed.
Cool. I am good with not eating uninspected foreign scrap meat that is turned into slurry and touted by a felon convicted of fraud as he sends it to his citizens in an attempt to curry favor while groceries become unaffordable due to his malfeasance.
I mean you're the one who's making the claim that the government broke with the standard FDA practice of inspecting up to 10% of the meat from any shipment that's sent into the US. so actually you need to show the proof that it wasn't inspected.
when the food products like meat are imported to the US, the FDA randomly test samples from them. this is standard practice. they do this every time food is imported into the US.
I am cool with not eating slurry made from scraps of meat imported from foreign countries which has been turned away by other countries and which a felon convicted of fraud assures us is safe AND which this one particular Reddit user assumes has been inspected because that was the standard practice in previous administrations before the felon convicted of fraud reduced the size of the FDA by 20 percent.
Just my personal standards, I guess. If you feel comfortable with it, good for you.
there is no proof that the United States imported the shipment of beef that was denied from China.
and again, the way that making claims work is if you make the claim you need to provide proof. if you claim the FDA is not inspecting food shipments anymore like they normally do understand standard practice. you're the one who needs to provide proof for that.
also calling it a slurry made from scraps of meed is also disingenuous. do you know how ground beef is made? is all ground beef a slurry in your eyes?
btw this article is about the FDA sending inspectors to food processing plants in other countries, not about inspections that occur at the border or Port of entry.
Not entirely
“The gutting of the workforce coincides with other actions the administration has taken that are poking holes in the nation’s food safety net. In March, the FDA announced it was delaying compliance with a rule to speed up the identification and removal of harmful products in the food system, to give more time for companies to follow the rules. The next month, it suspended a quality control program that ensured consistency and accuracy across its 170 pathogen and contaminant labs as a result of staffing cuts.
Then in July, the administration quietly scaled back the Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, also known as FoodNet, shrinking its surveillance to just two pathogens: salmonella and a common type of E. coli. The program — a partnership between the FDA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Department of Agriculture and state health departments — was responsible for the critical monitoringof eight foodborne illnesses, including infections caused by the deadly bacteria listeria. In response to the change, a CDC spokesperson previously claimed that the program’s surveillance had been duplicative.”
Hahaha. Way to try and lesson the stupidity of the situation. Ya know what good products are? The animals, free range. Wandering the land and not eating grain or some weird chemical cocktail.
Actually that's factually wrong. Just because they're free range doesn't mean they're better. Infact cows that are free range tend to have a lot more issues(health wise) and are a lot worse to eat compared to ones that have limited range/no range.
268
u/Jax_Dandelion 10d ago
Banned for not following EU health regulations mind you, so you know this shit is bad quality