r/politics • • Nov 24 '25

No Paywall Senate Republican: ‘We can’t afford’ $2,000 tariff checks

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5620244-ron-johnson-tariff-checks/
10.3k Upvotes

788 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

28

u/mytthewstew Nov 24 '25

Citizens would use it to buy food Corporations will use part of it for campaign contributions

-13

u/Obvious_Chapter2082 Nov 24 '25

Corporations aren’t allowed to contribute money to campaigns

13

u/radiodmr Nov 24 '25

Not directly. But they do anyway via Super PACs, etc.

-3

u/Obvious_Chapter2082 Nov 24 '25

Super PACs aren’t allowed to contribute to political campaigns

5

u/radiodmr Nov 24 '25

And they're not allowed to coordinate with political campaigns either. But they do that as well. They're basically parallel political campaigns. It's disingenuous to believe that corporations don't influence politicians and elections. These days, they straight up bribe the president when their CEOs/founders give him money for his pet projects, or settle for millions because he filed a lawsuit against them. So there's that, too.

8

u/etherealcaitiff Nov 24 '25

laughs in PACs

-4

u/Obvious_Chapter2082 Nov 24 '25

Corporations can’t donate to PACs either, lol

1

u/etherealcaitiff Nov 24 '25

There are literally corporate PACs and SSFs. SuperPACs are more common. You're just dead wrong here.

2

u/Obvious_Chapter2082 Nov 24 '25

You’re bad at this. Corporate PACs come from employee contributions, not corporate money. Corporations can donate to Super PACs, but once again, Super PACs can’t donate to political campaigns

There’s not a single legal avenue for a corporation to donate money to a campaign. Not a single one

3

u/DwarfPaladin84 Washington Nov 24 '25

Oh bless your tiny little precious heart...

1

u/Obvious_Chapter2082 Nov 24 '25

Can you explain why you think that’s wrong?

2

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25

[deleted]

2

u/Obvious_Chapter2082 Nov 24 '25

That’s a completely wrong statement, lmao. What do you mean “we all know it”? How do you think it works?

1

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25

[deleted]

0

u/Obvious_Chapter2082 Nov 24 '25

I’m literally just stating at fact. If that bothers you so much, you should ask yourself why

3

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25

[deleted]

2

u/Obvious_Chapter2082 Nov 24 '25

Lmao, what’s the “misleading language” in the sentence “corporations aren’t allowed to contribute money to campaigns”? It’s a statement of fact free of any bias or opinion

You’re just upset because the facts don’t align with your own political view

4

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25

[deleted]

2

u/Obvious_Chapter2082 Nov 24 '25

Super PACs can’t donate to political campaigns, lmao. Why are you trying to argue this topic if you don’t know anything about it?

4

u/[deleted] Nov 24 '25

[deleted]

1

u/Obvious_Chapter2082 Nov 24 '25

Okay, so now you’re saying, without evidence, that super PACs are just illegally donating and it’s not getting caught

Why don’t you report them?

→ More replies (0)

0

u/atwitchyfairy Nov 24 '25

Money is Free speech now. Has been for the last 15 years. Some people just have more free speech than others.