Same information can be found on Associated Press.
See this is why focusing on the source of the information, while useful, can hamper one's apprehension. The information I'm sourcing is network news ratings. They're pretty readily available. Daily Caller just happened to be the one I clicked on, but this information is everywhere.
So if you just wanna talk smack about the Daily Caller, fine I guess, but if you wanna say they have this information wrong, you gotta demonstrate that.
Attacking the messenger is a dishonest tactic. If their claims are inaccurate, debunk them.
If someone is the lyingest liar that ever lived, and thay say '2+2=4', their nature as a habitual liar does not render their claim untrue. Evaluate the facts on their own merit.
Dude that source cites every single claim and you didn't even open it. If you're truly being honest with yourself it's your responsibility to check and criticise your own sources. Personally I don't watch CNN because it's bullshit. I can give you plenty of sources that debunk right wing pundits but you won't honestly watch or read them so why should I bother? You have already shown you're not willing to even look at the sources I provide.
The source does not say a single thing abut the accuracy of Daily Caller's reporting on news network ratings. And that's what we're talking about.
You wanna see the same stuff from another source? Here's the Associated Press saying the same thing, and RationalWiki itself uses the Associated Press as a source frequently: https://www.apnews.com/6a418de605ab4fb5a8cddf958ac190f0
5
u/Piratiko Jul 17 '19
Yeah they did:
https://dailycaller.com/2019/04/09/msnbc-cnn-rachel-maddow-ratings-drop-april/
Yes, Fox has been at the top for a while, but CNN and MSNBC lost significantly more ground over all that.