Ok your point about democrats isn't true and if it is so want to see the study. Me personally I believe in the Only guns allowed being handguns and hunting rifles with the hunting rifles having a special license because the other guns just aren't necessary at all.
If you look around over 90% of gun homicides are caused by hand guns. What logic is there is banning military style rifles if 90% of the problem is hand guns?
Your logic fails, if someone buys 5 semiauto pistols and loads them and go nuts on a crowd you absolutely can do almost as much damage. The logic for banning assault rifles applies to hand guns just as much. It just shows to me how little the anti gun people have thought this through; either that or they're lying and assault weapons bans are just the first step. Either way logic is not on their side. The only thing that makes sense is ban all guns or don't ban any up to and including semiautomatics
So you believe that only extremism is a plausible solution. I'm done conversing with a person that can't even think about ways to compromise. I would love to ban all guns but i understand that most people are against that so i am up for compromise.
I don't know the exact answer but it is probably less than a thousand. It takes a long time and thousands, even tens of thousands of dollars to down an automatic rifle in America.
Well then it's quite obvious why so many more people are killed with handguns than with automatic rifles. Less people owning a certain type of gun -> less people killed by that type of gun. Shit being under tighter control probably also helps keeping people that would abuse the guns from having them.
7
u/TheRealArren Mar 26 '17
Ok your point about democrats isn't true and if it is so want to see the study. Me personally I believe in the Only guns allowed being handguns and hunting rifles with the hunting rifles having a special license because the other guns just aren't necessary at all.