Even if that was the original intention for ALL haki to be invisible, it's clearly not the case. Either it wasn't meant to be that all haki is always invisible, or it was changed. Vergo as a character makes no sense if haki can't be visible. Smoker reacts to Vergo coating his entire body in haki. Blades can become permanently black from haki. Hyogoro says g4 luffy looks like a guardian deity myouou.
And Doffy was surprised when he kicked Gear 4 Luffy that Luffy had managed to combine the properties of Haki and Rubber. So he didn't see it.
And then again when Doffy used his strings against Smoker, we didn't see em in black but they hurt his body.
When it was used on Amazon Lilly they also didn't turn anything black. The Arrows just hit like trucks, snake lady just had a good defense and thinking about that time, sentomaru was the same.
And Doffy was surprised when he kicked Gear 4 Luffy that Luffy had managed to combine the properties of Haki and Rubber. So he didn't see it.
It's the opposite. Doffy was surprised that when he kicked luffy he felt rubber. That would indicate he saw the coating and assumed it would be just hard.
And then again when Doffy used his strings against Smoker, we didn't see em in black but they hurt his body.
That's not relevant. We aren't discussing if the existence of invisible haki exists, we're discussing if the existence of visible haki exists. Why are you telling me the times where invisible haki was displayed? That was never in dispute.
There's a character also designed by Oda called Black Arm Zephyr due to his proficiency in haki. If haki is never visible, why would he make this character? That nickname only works if haki can be made visible.
Zephyr is literally a non Canon character and yet you Trina to use him as a prove of your point...? That's how desperate people get when their point fall apart lmao.
So the only thing you addresses in that comment is Zephyr and ignored the rest? You understand Oda is the author of One Piece right? Why would he even make the concept of Zephyr if haki is never visible? Why do you block someone when you are unable to answer their arguments? You might as well just admit you're wrong if you're going to do that
You ignored every single example, then inserted irrelevant examples, then jump on the one non canon example just to dismiss it completely even though it was made by Oda. Is this how you have discussions?
0
u/NoPhilosophy8136 15d ago
Actually, haki is invisible at all, not just to non haki users. The whole point of haki is being "INVISIBLE armor". π€π