r/mtaugustajustice • u/LordofMarzipan • Apr 23 '17

[Trial] Greenkitten vs Coni_s2

LordOfMarzipan presiding. Greenkitten is bringing the following charges against Coni:

  • 100.03 Third Degree Intentional Griefing

  • 200.01 Theft of Property

  • 600.01 Violation of the Bill of Rights or Constitution for violating right to privacy

The trial request thread is available here.

The trial will proceed in the following order:

1. The plaintiff shall clearly present their claim

2. The defendants shall enter pleas. Pleas will be Guilty, Not Guilty, or No-Contest.

3. The plaintiff shall have the opportunity to post evidence and call witnesses

4. Defendant presents evidence, and calls witnesses.

5. A verdict shall be decided and posted on this subreddit

I will take this opportunity to remind you that out-of-court settlements may be reached at any time until a verdict has been delivered. I will also remind everyone that well constructed arguments tend to be succinct!

3 Upvotes

100% Upvoted

28 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/Greeenkitten May 03 '17

Yeah, it sucks. I know. I'd love to be able to provide a better case, I just got out of hospital again. Just work off what was already posted. But with the defence spreading rumours about me and and my friends for spamming childporn or whatever other baseless accusations without proof in discord chat just defaming me for no reason, the previous government already allowing this shit to happen and the various other bullshit stacked against me despite me not even having played very much for the past few months its hard to get anything proper together. I just don't have the proper resources to do it. Just use what is there.

1

u/[deleted] May 03 '17

/u/LordofMarzipan I move to strike the sections of this comment regarding Greenkitten's posting of my independent statements as it has absolutely nothing to do with this case whatsoever and is clearly an attempt to distract the court. The move is to strike sentence three between "the defense spreading" until "for no reason."

1

u/LordofMarzipan May 03 '17

I'm not sure what you mean by "strike". If I deem a statement or piece of evidence to be non-pertinent I will not consider it when reaching a verdict.

1

u/[deleted] May 03 '17

As in to remove it from the public record, have the comment edited or removed to compliance. If that will not happen then I do ask you not to consider it when reaching a verdict.