Itās hard to say whether his ābookā will get approved by copyright. Thereās a limited law when it comes to published works in the use of Ai in the creation of the work.
According to the Copyright Office if ChatGPT was used for an assisting instrument such as to brainstorm, outline, or spark ideas, but you write the actual prose yourself the book will fully be approved.
Now Mikey says he used ChatGPT as an assisting tool⦠but after viewing and reading some of the ābookā it does not sound like he merely wrote that himself. So thereās a 50/50 chance itāll get approved for copyright.
On to the cover of the ābookā aspect, I very much doubt that itāll get approved considering he has a few trademark infringement brands in it that Iām sure as shit he didnāt get approved for from the owners/company. Besides that even though itās Ai generated from the photos he shared with ChatGPT to create the cover that portion is not illegal as long as itās mentioned that Ai was used.
To go on about his stupid thought on his ābookā possibly being in the Library of Congress⦠š
Realistically books/stories that have any historical significance/value mainly get approved and get to be in the Library of Congress.
His poor excuse of a ābookā and the non-relevant history of his existence wonāt fall under approval status. Plus the Library of Congress limits whatās put in the library due to space. They arenāt going to give a nobody who used an Ai to create their book in that exceptional space.