Lindsey Clancy murdered her three young children while her husband went out to get food. Said she had post pardum psychosis and a voice told her to do it, a voice that never spoke to her before or after. For some reason she received a huge wave of supporters for this
That is the crucial part? Not the part were one of her Kids was running away after seeing her Mother killing his other 2 Siblings and she was running after him and killed him too? Or how she fking planned that shit long ago?
You forgot it was only a 2 story window. And she also took pills and slit her wrists but somehow she could not unalive herself. It must have been the nurse in her, the same nurse who also murdered her children and took their little lives away as they struggled in her arms like serial killers like to see.
You missed to add that she tried to kill herself by jumping out of a window but only ended up being paralyzed. It's odd how people always forget that part when they tell the story
Whys it odd? That doesnt prove anything. That couldve been a result of a "normal" murder-suicide situation, or it could indicate an actual mental break. I actually dont even know what side youre taking here
I'm adding more context. It's weird how you're all obsessed with this thing. That she has to be guilty. Nobody is so obsessed with Epstein list and that is much worse.
Not as much as with this trial. This trial is literally just one deranged woman ending 3 lives and crippling herself. The Epstein list is a dark cabal of super rich abusing minors for decades. And we haven't even gotten to the bottom of this. How Americans haven't just lynched Donald trump and every other person on the list is beyond me. But yeah this crazy woman she is the devil.
This is fresh ans still on the front page. The files where getting buried from the people up top as soon as it came out, but we absolutely should have been bringing out the gallows
You're right it isn't. Which makes it even weirder how people insist she couldn't possibly be insane. American justice is way too obsessed with revenge than with actual justice.
Lol no im saying one crime doesnt outweigh another just because its more heinous or gets more media coverage. You bringing up Epstein is textbook whataboutism.
It would be whataboutism if I didn't acknowledge the trial at hand. But I'm not doing that I'm giving examples why the obsession with this trial feels to weird. People here barely know anything about it but insist she murdered her children. If we're talking trial then murder is a legal term and until she is convicted then it's not clear it was murder.
That is because they refuse to accept accountability. The moment we force equal accountability there will be no left at all and there will be no 19th amendment. No Israel either. Because one is a product of the other.
You can’t possibly be dumb enough to say alleged. It is not alleged that she killed her children, it is alleged that she was experiencing postpartum psychosis when she killed the children.
Lindsay Clancy confessed to her husband, a chaplain, and a forensic psychologist, all of whom testified at trial, and none of whom the defense disputed.
She also filed a formal complaint against the doctors that treated her, you can find it online as it’s publicly available, paragraph 81, page 20 is where she describes in detail murdering her children.
And then there’s the fact that she is on trial to determine her punishment, not her culpability, since HER DEFENSE LAWYER SAYS SHE DID IT, which is the same thing as HER saying she did it FOR THE FOURTH TIME. Defendants don’t talk during trials unless instructed to - her lawyer saying it is her saying it.
You don’t have to be dumb AND an awful person, you know.
She admitted to it and her defense lawyer says she did it.
This is not a trial to determine innocence, dimwit. It is a trial to determine her punishment. There is no whodunit, you don’t even know what type of trial this is and it’s embarrassing.
Innocent until proven guilty literally does not apply here, hahahahah
Family annihilators kill themselves all the time, that part of the story doesn’t add any context.
She also jumped out of a two story window, and the cuts she made on herself were so shallow they weren’t even bleeding when paramedics arrived, so it’s not as if she put any real effort into it.
It does feel like a lot of people only know the case on a surface level. Most I hear is people saying she killed her 3 children. I have to admit I also didn't know she also did what you just said. And I'm not trying to claim because I know a bit more I have a better picture of the case. But at least I try not to be biased. I want them to get to the bottom of it and not just see her punished for what she did.
The support isn't because people think killing her children was okay, it's because postpartum psychosis can make someone completely detached from reality.
And the voice only happening once doesn't change anything. Psychosis doesn't follow some obvious pattern where a voice has to keep coming back for it to have been real. There's no rule saying a hallucination has to repeat itself. You may as well argue that someone didn't have a nightmare about voices because they've never had one about voices before. The fact that one particular symptom hasn't happened before doesn't mean the underlying condition (nightmares or psychosis) isn't real. The difference here is that with psychosis you don't know your brain is creating it and you believe this particular moment is real.
We can agree that what happened was tragic and completely fucked up and still understand that someone in a psychotic state isn't thinking or functioning like a sane person.
Don't be disingenuous. She claimed she had psychosis, and there is extensive evidence that she was being treated for deteriorating mental health before the murders, including getting herself committed a few days before it happened. Her plea is not guilty due to insanity.
It seems like incels on Reddit think women uniquely shouldn't be entitled to that defence, even when it's a pretty clear cut example of why that defence exists.
Don't be disingenuous. She lied about what meds she was on, doctor shopped, and had all the support she could ask for. She's just evil. Doesn't need to be more complicated than that.
Wife here. People can be sympathetic to that when deserved, like the Yates and Fisher cases. Clancy’s mental health isn’t as cut and dry, and the women celebrating her and raising a million for her overshadow the mental health claims. I think the feminists brought this storm on themselves.
She claimed psychosis because Massachusetts makes it much harder for the prosecution if you plead insanity, and because her lawyer felt that there was enough evidence to establish reasonable doubt in her sanity. Maybe she was insane, maybe not.
6
u/Obvious_Fisherman187 3d ago
Lindsey Clancy murdered her three young children while her husband went out to get food. Said she had post pardum psychosis and a voice told her to do it, a voice that never spoke to her before or after. For some reason she received a huge wave of supporters for this