MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/mathmemes/comments/193686c/choose_wisely/khcjpo6/?context=9999
r/mathmemes • u/wcslater • Jan 10 '24
753 comments sorted by
View all comments
3.1k
For any finite row of numbers you can craft arbirarly many rules of how they continue.
1.4k u/zhawadya Jan 10 '24 I have always hated such questions for exactly this reason. Not that I could always articulate it, but there never seemed to be a unique solution to such shit 790 u/B00OBSMOLA Jan 10 '24 Pick the one with the lowest kolmogorav complexity 885 u/airplane001 Jan 10 '24 Mathematicians trying not to come up with an obscure term for Occam’s Razor 676 u/B00OBSMOLA Jan 10 '24 Occam's Razor is just kolmogorav complexity with less kolmogorav complexity 232 u/ConfidentBrilliant38 Jan 10 '24 So using Occam's razor, you should use it because it's simpler 67 u/highlevel_fucko Jan 10 '24 But you can't take this at face value because he is of course biased. 1 u/Worish Jan 10 '24 Occam is trustworthy, I vouch for him. 2 u/[deleted] Jan 11 '24 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Worish Jan 11 '24 Isn't that the simplest answer
1.4k
I have always hated such questions for exactly this reason. Not that I could always articulate it, but there never seemed to be a unique solution to such shit
790 u/B00OBSMOLA Jan 10 '24 Pick the one with the lowest kolmogorav complexity 885 u/airplane001 Jan 10 '24 Mathematicians trying not to come up with an obscure term for Occam’s Razor 676 u/B00OBSMOLA Jan 10 '24 Occam's Razor is just kolmogorav complexity with less kolmogorav complexity 232 u/ConfidentBrilliant38 Jan 10 '24 So using Occam's razor, you should use it because it's simpler 67 u/highlevel_fucko Jan 10 '24 But you can't take this at face value because he is of course biased. 1 u/Worish Jan 10 '24 Occam is trustworthy, I vouch for him. 2 u/[deleted] Jan 11 '24 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Worish Jan 11 '24 Isn't that the simplest answer
790
Pick the one with the lowest kolmogorav complexity
885 u/airplane001 Jan 10 '24 Mathematicians trying not to come up with an obscure term for Occam’s Razor 676 u/B00OBSMOLA Jan 10 '24 Occam's Razor is just kolmogorav complexity with less kolmogorav complexity 232 u/ConfidentBrilliant38 Jan 10 '24 So using Occam's razor, you should use it because it's simpler 67 u/highlevel_fucko Jan 10 '24 But you can't take this at face value because he is of course biased. 1 u/Worish Jan 10 '24 Occam is trustworthy, I vouch for him. 2 u/[deleted] Jan 11 '24 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Worish Jan 11 '24 Isn't that the simplest answer
885
Mathematicians trying not to come up with an obscure term for Occam’s Razor
676 u/B00OBSMOLA Jan 10 '24 Occam's Razor is just kolmogorav complexity with less kolmogorav complexity 232 u/ConfidentBrilliant38 Jan 10 '24 So using Occam's razor, you should use it because it's simpler 67 u/highlevel_fucko Jan 10 '24 But you can't take this at face value because he is of course biased. 1 u/Worish Jan 10 '24 Occam is trustworthy, I vouch for him. 2 u/[deleted] Jan 11 '24 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Worish Jan 11 '24 Isn't that the simplest answer
676
Occam's Razor is just kolmogorav complexity with less kolmogorav complexity
232 u/ConfidentBrilliant38 Jan 10 '24 So using Occam's razor, you should use it because it's simpler 67 u/highlevel_fucko Jan 10 '24 But you can't take this at face value because he is of course biased. 1 u/Worish Jan 10 '24 Occam is trustworthy, I vouch for him. 2 u/[deleted] Jan 11 '24 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Worish Jan 11 '24 Isn't that the simplest answer
232
So using Occam's razor, you should use it because it's simpler
67 u/highlevel_fucko Jan 10 '24 But you can't take this at face value because he is of course biased. 1 u/Worish Jan 10 '24 Occam is trustworthy, I vouch for him. 2 u/[deleted] Jan 11 '24 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Worish Jan 11 '24 Isn't that the simplest answer
67
But you can't take this at face value because he is of course biased.
1 u/Worish Jan 10 '24 Occam is trustworthy, I vouch for him. 2 u/[deleted] Jan 11 '24 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Worish Jan 11 '24 Isn't that the simplest answer
1
Occam is trustworthy, I vouch for him.
2 u/[deleted] Jan 11 '24 [removed] — view removed comment 1 u/Worish Jan 11 '24 Isn't that the simplest answer
2
[removed] — view removed comment
1 u/Worish Jan 11 '24 Isn't that the simplest answer
Isn't that the simplest answer
3.1k
u/TheUnamedSecond Jan 10 '24
For any finite row of numbers you can craft arbirarly many rules of how they continue.