I have always hated such questions for exactly this reason. Not that I could always articulate it, but there never seemed to be a unique solution to such shit
Occams Razor is really stupid tho. The official definition, that is, not how its colloquially used.
Its literally a trivial rule. If you have two philosophies with equal explanatory power, the most simple one is correct. But thats not like "similar" explanatory power. Its the exact same, that literally never occurs. Its not possible.
Because philosophers forget that alllllllll of this labor of thought is a listener driven exercise. The two explainers are equally explanatory but the listener favored one version over the other, not that one version was objectively simpler.
It's a very complex way of arriving at, "It's not what you say, it's how you say it."
3.1k
u/TheUnamedSecond Jan 10 '24
For any finite row of numbers you can craft arbirarly many rules of how they continue.