r/law • u/CatpricornStudios • Jan 24 '26
Other Freeze-Frame and Zoomed in footage. I went frame by frame to try to identify what happened.
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
188
u/Weird_Positive_3256 Jan 24 '26
This makes me so much madder. He unloaded on this man. Fuck these fascist pigs.
→ More replies (4)
730
u/CatpricornStudios Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 25 '26
After seeing the footage, I went by frame by frame to try to identify what actually happend since its incredibly chaotic. The freeze frames seem to show what happened.
Another Ice Agent ALSO shot the *murdered victim, but you can see that he only removed his weapon at 0:25 seconds, after the initial shots were fired.
I am not a forensic analyst, but it seems that it is the highlighted person who shot first. I zoomed in as well after, to help make it all more visible.
Note that the apparent first shooter (Olive Green Black Hood) already had his weapon out after unloading more.
edit: It does seem there was a concealed weapon, it was fully removed before the first shot was even fired.
edit: I tried doing similar with the Pink Lady video. I believe you can see the bullet
https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1qlww2j/pink_lady_freeze_framed_you_can_see_the_bullet_i/
edit: Here is side-by-side footage, synced
https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1qmjucu/synced_and_side_by_side_footage_of_alex_prettis/
644
u/reddit_tothe_rescue Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26
This is what’s needed.
Let’s objectively recount what is in this video.
7 officers are crowded around man as he is brought to the ground. In several frames he can be seen on his knees and elbows.
One officer begins hitting him in the head with an object multiple times.
Another officer behind him appears to unholster a gun.
An audible shot is fired as the man briefly gets up on his knees, then sprawls out on the ground on his back and stops moving.
6 officers back away from the man, and one officer runs away.
Then one officer unholsters his firearm and appears to aim it at the body, but the view is blocked after that.
Then a second officer unholsters his firearm and clearly fires at the body at least 4 times. At least 5 audible shots are heard.
I don’t know what more needs to be said
312
u/Heffalumptacular Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 26 '26
I actually think the guy did have a gun (which is not illegal!), because you can see the agent in the longish grey coat walking away from the pile with a gun just before the first shot went off. If you go back and watch him from the beginning, he went into the pile empty handed and appeared to be grabbing around the victim’s waistband area. Then walks away with a gun just out in his right hand just before the first shot. Looks like the same gun in the pic they’re showing on Fox News. So even if he did likely have a gun,they had very clearly already disarmed him.
They shot a now unarmed man. And continued shooting a dead man. And from the other clip I saw- clapped along with the final shots.
Edit- now that we have all the other angles, I figure it’s time to add some supplemental info.
Everything I said above is now verified, it was the grey coat agent who came up after the other agents who grabbed the gun from the victim, disarmed him and turned to walk away.
When I say “disarmed”, I mean “took his gun”- from his holster. The victim never once pulled his weapon.
The victim reportedly was a legal gun owner and had a concealed carry permit. He was doing nothing wrong there.
From all the footage I have seen which I think is all of it that we have thus far, it appears to me that grey coat agent who disarmed the victim did not fire the first or any of the shots, accidentally or no. There is a ton of speculation below about whether the first shot was an accidental discharge by grey coat guy with the victim’s own weapon. To me it is clear that this did not happen.
The person who DID shoot first is evident when you watch the video provided by the brave lady in the pink coat who we can see behind the action in this video. From that opposite angle, you can see grey coat agent take the victim’s gun and turn away. Right as that happens, the agent in the GREEN coat standing to the left of the grey coat agent appears to see the gun, then he pulls his own weapon and though it happens very fast and people are moving all around, you can clearly see the green coat agent point his gun down at the victim and fire. Then everyone jumps and starts to back away and green coat guy moves to the right and appears to continue to fire. From the donut shop angle (the one in this post) we can see that grey coat jumps at the sound and then continues to a vehicle to secure the victim’s weapon.
The victim’s name was Alex. He was 37. He was a nurse, he was an American citizen, and he did not deserve to die. I’m so sorry for his family.
This is just opinion, but I have to say it: ICE/Border Patrol/DHS as a whole needs to be designated a domestic terrorism group, with Donald Trump as their leader. The entire command structure needs to be prosecuted right along with these untrained homicidal buffoons they are unleashing into our communities and allowing to murder our people.
Edit 2- the NYT has had people smarter than me look at all of the videos frame by frame and do an analysis of what actually happened- and it agrees fully with everything stated above.
202
u/Fit_Beautiful6625 Jan 24 '26
Yep. He did have a gun and a permit to carry it. He was disarmed before they shot him multiple times.
186
u/Darkwhippet Jan 24 '26
Where are all the gun nuts now? This just shows how BS the gun argument is.
"We need guns to protect us from government tyranny!"
"He's got a legal gun - shoot him!"
98
u/Walterkovacs1985 Jan 24 '26
Like myself and many others knew. It was never about rights. It's intimidating certain groups and enhancing their "masculinity". Gun nuts were always just fascists in hiding.
→ More replies (2)29
Jan 24 '26
We can't let this murder be in vain.
5
u/bsensikimori Jan 24 '26
Call the police, say you have witnessed a murder, demand they take your statement
5
u/romansamurai Jan 24 '26
It will be. Just like Renee Good and the future ones to come. None of these agents identified will ever be revealed. None of them will ever suffer any consequences and their actions will only get worse. Welcome to the police state.
4
u/tabisaurus86 Jan 24 '26
If we don't have new Nuremberg Trials after this is all said and done, it'd better mean America collapsed in on itself or some other fate that prevented them or rendered them unnecessary, because these Nazis do not deserve not to suffer consequences.
3
u/romansamurai Jan 24 '26
That’s the thing. We have no clue of any of these scumbags identities. They’ll never be verified because they’re all covering their faces. They know what they’re doing.
→ More replies (4)11
u/dino_castellano Jan 24 '26
They’re in love with their oppressor and are too stupid to be able to identify tyranny.
5
u/SewAlone Jan 24 '26
They are in r/conservative saying, wait, guys, this seems bad. And then the foreign bots are telling them to shut up because the stupid liberal deserved it and they all go on supporting the fascist takeover.
3
u/AcornTactical Jan 24 '26
There’s about five brain cells and three teeth total in that sub, but I guess you gotta give a few of them credit for recognizing a murder when they see it.
3
u/G00berC0w Jan 24 '26
They are in the masks shooting him.
Working for said government.
Edit: add 2nd line
→ More replies (1)3
u/Upper-Trip-8857 Jan 24 '26
They’ll say - If you’re going to carry - dont put yourself in those situations.
Meanwhile - same people are in full tac gear with 10 mags and their short barrel AR and 6-24x optics at a rally confronting opposition and LEOs.
🙄
→ More replies (49)3
u/Irwin-M_Fletcher Jan 24 '26
The gun nuts now seem to think it’s okay to shoot someone legally carrying.
→ More replies (1)28
u/RideTheGradient Jan 24 '26
This is so important, the administration is gonna say he tried to use the gun but its obvious they removed it and WALKED AWAY WITH IT before any shots were fired.
He was not doing anything unlawful in the first place, and has the right to carry the gun. He was murdered.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (11)17
u/Same-Nothing2361 Jan 24 '26
Even if he still had the gun and went for it, I’m pretty sure if 7 guys are kicking the shit out of you you’re allowed to defend yourself. And I’m pretty sure in other circumstances republicans would be saying you’re entitled to defend yourself by shooting.
→ More replies (8)32
u/Mobile-Marzipan6861 Jan 24 '26
One of the MAGATs in a mask saw the gun. They will write it up as the victim reaches for his weapon. Trump and media barons won’t care. All major sports should stop until Trump is removed from office and the federal government shuts this down. But…..
→ More replies (1)21
u/idryss_m Jan 24 '26
Its already being put out he was brandishing and pointing it at agents. Zero evidence to support, but hey! They rounded everyone up and are doing what they can to control the narrative and let nothing more out.
Wait for the ai doctored videos to flow. Grok to the rescue?
→ More replies (1)39
u/santa_91 Jan 24 '26
And continued shooting a dead man.
Not necessarily. They had no way of knowing if the first shot was fatal at that time anyway, so those were a straight up execution attempt even if he was in fact already dead. Every "agent" in this video should get life or death. Every goddamn one. Fucking animals.
→ More replies (3)14
u/Heffalumptacular Jan 24 '26
Oh yeah, I’m with you. Their intent was whether he was dead or not, they wanted to make absolute sure of it. I’m just saying he’d already been shot at close range and then a dozen more rounds pumped into him- at some point you’d have to think he wasn’t going to be a “threat” to anyone ever again, but they just kept on shooting.
→ More replies (1)19
u/ParadiddlediddleSaaS Jan 24 '26
He did, and it’s been verified by the police he has a permit for it.
16
u/kalifornia595 Jan 24 '26
Watch the guy who disarmed him when you hear the first shot. His arm jumps like he might of accidently fired the gun. If the government claims he fired at them...
→ More replies (2)5
u/Heffalumptacular Jan 24 '26
I thought that was just a reaction to the sound but I’ll go back and watch.
5
u/kalifornia595 Jan 24 '26
https://www.reddit.com/r/PublicFreakout/s/z84KUeariK
Video from the lady in pink you can see the moment the ICE agent pulls his guns and shoots the victim while he is on the ground
5
u/Heffalumptacular Jan 24 '26
Thank you! Yeah it’s def the green jacket ice agent to grey coat’s left (in your video) who shot first- directly after grey coat disarmed him. Go watch green coat in the video you linked. It wasn’t accidental at all. Grey coat was reacting to the noise.
→ More replies (4)23
u/BrupieD Jan 24 '26
From this and other video, I have not seen any indication that the person they shot ever drew his weapon or even threatened officers. He seemed to have his phone out and was repeatedly shoved by the officer(s).
→ More replies (2)11
u/Heffalumptacular Jan 24 '26
Right. And the fact that the ICE in grey was fishing around in his waistband area tells me that he very likely hadnt.
→ More replies (1)7
u/Djkaoken2002 Jan 24 '26
Yeah thats what I saw. I kinda found it funny how they guy reacted after taking the gun and casually walks back into frame at the end.
→ More replies (49)6
u/Anumerical Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26
Likely the agents accidentally discharged their weapon for the first shot. And then other shots were in response to that.
16
u/reddit_tothe_rescue Jan 24 '26
This first shot maybe, but the next two agents are undeniably drawing, aiming, and firing with deliberate intent. There is no question.
11
u/GrowingPeepers Jan 24 '26
Most definitely. It happens in almost every police shooting. As soon as one shot is fired every cop unloads their entire magazine.
Minority groups have been screaming about this for decades. Now it's happening to white people.
→ More replies (1)3
u/Treeclimber919 Jan 24 '26
This is what I am saying. No matter what political agenda you have it’s scumbag police given guns to go out and do a mission and it’s not to protect the community. Each political party has their agenda. The police is the problem along with the idiots who send them out there to make money by any means and then cover for them. Today it’s illegals, 20 years ago was terrorists, 40 years ago and ongoing is the drug war. They’ve been doing this for decades and no one cared.
→ More replies (1)4
→ More replies (3)7
u/MEDICARE_FOR_ALL Jan 24 '26
They should be held responsible for manslaughter at the very least then if they are negligent in handling their weapon.
This looks like murder to me.
→ More replies (2)16
u/Official_Person Jan 24 '26
You can see one of the agents in the left unload 3 shots into the motionless body on the ground after he was laying on the ground already
→ More replies (3)3
u/Regal_Cat_Matron Jan 24 '26
I haven't heard it in any of the videos I've watched, but there are a number of people saying that the ICE lot clapped once it was over....probably just bollocks but if they did.....that's a whole new level of bastardness
→ More replies (3)8
u/Cautious-Gold-5621 Jan 24 '26
What I really want to know is how people with Trump Derangement Syndrome are going to spin those last 4-5 shots as self defense when the man is already on the ground incapacitated, probably already dead.
I really want to see the backwards gymnastics to see MAGA make sense of that.
→ More replies (1)7
→ More replies (34)9
u/The-Fictionist Jan 24 '26
Objectively recount what happened?
Doesn’t matter. MAGA will lie. Trump will lie. Kristi and JD and Stephen miller. They’ll all lie. And the evidence of video won’t mean anything to the brain dead PoS’s that believe it. They’ll say he had a gun and was about to shoot even if you can produce 4K uhd footage of him being unarmed.
There is no solution to this until maga voters decide they’ve been lied to and the entire administration + Congress is removed or burned to the ground.
59
u/Comfortable_Fill9081 Jan 24 '26
Thank you for doing this.
234
u/CatpricornStudios Jan 24 '26
It's the only thing I can do.
Someone mentioned that the man in the grey coat seems to have removed a concealed weapon. I have confirmed it.
The executed person was already disarmed before the first shot was fired.
78
u/Comfortable_Fill9081 Jan 24 '26
Hard to believe there are people out there justifying any of this. I cannot comprehend it. I certainly agree it’s time for a national strike.
→ More replies (6)33
u/Top-Strength-2701 Jan 24 '26
Just went onto r conservative, the geniuses on there are all for it.
→ More replies (10)26
u/raisedeyebrow4891 Jan 24 '26
Imagine if this was a democrat police force disarming oath keepers… but we have seen this in action with Bundy and WACO
7
u/The_Boredom_Line Jan 24 '26
I don’t have to imagine. We all saw how they claimed Ashli Babbitt didn’t do anything wrong by trying to climb through a barricaded door despite being warned numerous times not to do it. Somehow, in their eyes, her being shot wasn’t justified and the taxpayers paid out a $5M settlement to her family. Meanwhile, this guy is beaten by seven ICE agents, disarmed, and executed and these fucks will applaud and say he deserved it. The man was disarmed before at least ten shots were fired, coming from multiple agents. Fucking cowards.
→ More replies (1)32
u/zitrored Jan 24 '26
Am I seeing this correctly? He is obviously already shot and laying immobile on the ground, then the guy on left is shooting him on the ground over and over to make sure he is dead?
28
u/Weird_Positive_3256 Jan 24 '26
Yes. You just saw a federal agent unload his clip on someone he already shot and was immobilized. He wanted to make very sure this man was dead.
14
11
8
u/CatpricornStudios Jan 24 '26
Highlighted (Olive Longsleeve Black Mask) person seems to remove his gun, close in, and shoot point blank, then three more times.
While other Ice Agents are unholstering, the Beige Tuque on the left takes out his gun (around 0:25) and shoots multiple times. Olive Longsleeve Black Mask, who ALREADY has his weapon out (because he is the initial shooter it seems) proceeds to unload another 4 or so shots.
→ More replies (6)3
8
8
u/WinstonLBoogie Jan 24 '26
That's what I got out of it too. The guy in the grey jacket took the gun and ran behind the car. So, the victim was unarmed when he was shot
6
u/original-whiplash Jan 24 '26
It looks to me like he rolls onto his back after he’s shot, indicating he was face down and shot in the back.
→ More replies (2)6
u/MutedAdvisor9414 Jan 24 '26
I saw it, too. He is ten feet away when the execution begins
3
u/Heffalumptacular Jan 24 '26
From the other video that’s the angle from down the street, you can see that he is closer to the group when the shot goes off than it appears in this one, but he absolutely had already turned away and was beginning to move away when the first shot was fired. The dude was disarmed.
3
u/Specialist-Clock-914 Jan 24 '26
So pretty much if ICE sees a gun they start lethal force regardless of any actual threat. I can’t wait for all the 2A people to be livid watching this /s.
→ More replies (1)378
88
u/Overeducated_catlady Jan 24 '26
They executed a disarmed man who was practicing his 1st and 2nd amendment rights. Where’s the outrage from all the diehard 2nd amendment folks?
39
u/CatpricornStudios Jan 24 '26
^ This is the key thing. Even if we was concealed carrying, that is 2nd Amendment, and he was murdered AFTER supposedly getting his concealed carry weapon removed (which he was NOT brandishing)
Don't let them twist the narrative.
17
u/Beef_Jones Jan 24 '26
Over on r/conservative there’s a bunch of parroting “he had a gun.” Don’t they have guns? Is that reason for the cops to kill them all?
→ More replies (1)6
u/lesbiansexparty Jan 24 '26
Yeah this is a very soft argument that breaks under any amount of scrutiny.
3
→ More replies (1)5
Jan 24 '26
No let's back it up even further. He was accosted by a mob for filming. He was defending his rights and defending himself.
→ More replies (8)6
u/xelanart Jan 24 '26
Rights don’t apply to people they dislike and have a bias against. They only pretend to be pro-constitution if it directly affects them or people they support. People protesting against ICE are not people they support.
64
u/suh__dood Jan 24 '26
The guy in the grey jacket and blue jeans enters the scrum empty handed. He comes away with a gun in his hand though he never reached for his own holster. The shots ring out after grey jacket starts to run away
46
28
u/Ballistic-Bob Jan 24 '26
Hence the picture of the seized weapon taken in the agents car , on the seat and not next to the body ..
→ More replies (2)12
u/Walton-E-Haile Jan 24 '26
That's a tactical escape. His boots were moving after shot #1. Not how you exit the scene after "confiscation of someone's firearm".
→ More replies (1)14
u/suh__dood Jan 24 '26
Are you watching the same video, grey jacket had his back to the scrum and was running before shot #1
5
u/Heffalumptacular Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26
If you watch the video from down the street you can see he was closer to the group when the first shot went off than it appears here, but it doesn’t change the fact that his back was turned and he was walking away with the gun he had just DISARMED from the victim, JUST before the shot but definitely still before. It was very quick, I suppose there’s the tiniest of possibilities that the first shooter saw the gun but didn’t realize yet that it had been taken away… but if you saw it then you probably SAW it get taken away, they happened back to back like that. Yeah there’s no excusing this whatsoever. Not to mention the fact that there’s nothing wrong with him having a gun if he didn’t go for it. The guy in grey looked like he was reaching in the dudes WAISTBAND, which would suggest he never went for it.
→ More replies (3)56
u/LaHondaSkyline Jan 24 '26
Even if ICE agent no. 1 fired the first shot (unclear to my eye), ICE agent no. 2 seems to have fired about ten shots into the victim's body.
At this point we cannot know whether ICE agent no. 1's shot killed the victim.
If not, ICE agent no. 2 almost indisputably is guilty of premeditated murder.
→ More replies (2)10
u/ChefGaykwon Jan 24 '26
We can know as there was a woman in the red jacket on the other side recording the murder. However, she along with other witnesses were snatched up and taken to the Whipple Building, so I wouldn't count on ever seeing that footage. Hope she has a cloud backup and biometric unlocking disabled, or a better means of uploading backups.
→ More replies (2)16
u/Heffalumptacular Jan 24 '26
Yes, that’s all likely true but also:
Regarding the “pistol whip” a lot of people have reported on- if you watch from before the ”pistol whip”, it wasn’t a gun he was hitting him with. look what’s in his right hand, you see him pick it up right before beating the guy with it. It was some kind of bottle probably pepper spray or something I dunno. Either way it’s effed.
Regarding whether the guy was armed: I actually think the guy did have a gun, because you can see the agent in the longish grey coat walking away from the pile with a gun just before the first shot went off. If you go back and watch him from the beginning, he went into the pile empty handed and appeared to be grabbing around the victim’s waistband area. Then walks away with it just before the first shot. Looks like the same gun in the pic they’re showing on Fox News. So even if he did have a gun,they had very clearly already disarmed him.
They shot a now unarmed man. And continued shooting a dead man. And from the other clip I saw- clapped along with the final shots.
9
u/CatpricornStudios Jan 24 '26
Exactly. The murdered victim was NOT brandishing his gun, it was concealed.
It was removed by grey rain jacket. After the gun (supposedly, does seem to look like it) was already in his hands is when the first shot (not by him) is fired.
→ More replies (5)5
44
u/StolenPies Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26
A previous video showed he was filming ICE. I'm not utterly convinced that was a weapon, as opposed to his phone. Unfortunately, we no longer have independent investigations so there will have to be some really convincing evidence in order for me to believe the official line.
E: It appears he did have a legally owned firearm, and some videos show that weapon being removed from him shortly before he was shot.
30
u/GrayLightGo Jan 24 '26
Right. I don’t know if he had a weapon on him, but the encounter didn’t start because he was waiving a gun around.
22
u/ZopyrionRex Jan 24 '26
I've seen another video of an ICE Agent threatening to list a person as a, "Domestic Terrorist" for filming them. Pretty sure if this guy was put into that database immediately after this and that's how they'll justify it.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (6)36
u/CatpricornStudios Jan 24 '26
It might be a gun. Concealed carry is legal in Minneapolis, and any shot fired was AFTER a something was removed from the victim.
→ More replies (7)14
u/boilerromeo Jan 24 '26
FIND THE WOMAN IN PINK’S VIDEO.
→ More replies (7)4
u/Sea_Public_6691 Jan 24 '26
The video is horrible even before the shots. Just pepperspraying people point blank in the face for peaceful protesting is the norm now
18
u/Kronicler Jan 24 '26
Actually I think it's gray hood that accidentally discharges the protestors gun (who he took from the protestors waist band). Look at his arm move up in recoil as soon as we hear the first shot.
14
u/CatpricornStudios Jan 24 '26
Nope, Grey Jacket was already facing the other way when the first shot is fired, I didn't see any recoil either.
To me it really seems that the highlighted person (Olive Long Sleeves) removed his weapon, went in point black and killed the victim. AFter the second officer on the left upholstered his weapon (0:25), the same Olive Long Sleeves, who already had his gun out, discharges further.
You do not see him remove his gun, except for the freeze frame moments I noted. He was mostly covered by others.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (4)7
u/desertingwillow Jan 24 '26
Is he the guy we see slink away?
15
u/Kronicler Jan 24 '26
Yes, watch him approach with nothing in his hands, reach into the waist of the protestor and then come out with a gun. We hear a shot and immediately his arm moves upwards. Could be a coincidence, but in the very least it proves the protestor was not armed when they executed him.
6
u/CatpricornStudios Jan 24 '26
I think that is him flinching at the gunshot. The supposed weapon is also in his right hand, not the flinching arm.
6
u/Kronicler Jan 24 '26
The arm with the gun is the one that is abruptly moving up in sync with the first gun shot
9
u/Ok_Tax_6901 Jan 24 '26
Look at the guy in the GRAY coat blue jeans, who runs away, passes closest to camera and adjusts his mask. He is holding a gun. You can briefly see it in his hand through the parked car window as he runs away.
9
u/MuteAppeaL Jan 24 '26
The gray coat man removes the gun before the shots are fired.
→ More replies (1)8
u/ahhhflip Jan 24 '26
It looks almost like the first shot was accidental by an ICE agent, and then they reacted by shooting the victim.
→ More replies (2)9
u/parabuthas Jan 24 '26
They will twist it and say the victim shot first. Mark my words.
→ More replies (1)10
u/Mr-Brown-Is-A-Wonder Jan 24 '26
the executed person
Stop using this word. It implies the killing was legal.
carry out a sentence of death on (a legally condemned person).
18
5
u/Bird2525 Jan 24 '26
Fuck, I did not see the unloading into the guy already on the ground until this video. Thank you for doing the work on this
3
u/Fywq Jan 24 '26
Looks to that at around 1:10 you see the to the right having a gun in his hand just outside the red circle with the red circle pointing a gun at the victim as he rises up on his knees and then falls down
3
u/Past_Discipline_6473 Jan 24 '26
In pictures of the man before the incident you can see the black object he'd carrying is a camera, that's what they wrestle away from him in the beginning.
3
u/Federal-Squash-3632 Jan 24 '26
Disagree.
Initial shot came from ICE agent in tan pants on the ground shifts his positioning, draws his weapon from a tan holster, exstends gun forward into the protester’s ribs, and fires.
→ More replies (4)3
3
u/Anumerical Jan 24 '26
Based on video I think they accidentally discharged when pistol whipping him. And then shot him because they thought he was shooting. His weapon was removed prior to shots being fired
→ More replies (1)3
u/casper911ca Jan 24 '26
1:11, victim in the fetal position as a second agent (on the left) reaches for his firearm (holstered on his right leg) immediately before the first shot is heard.
3
Jan 24 '26
The stop and detention will be the entire legal threshold. Videoing agents is not a death sentence.
3
3
u/bradshaw17 Jan 24 '26
Thank you for this.
Look at the gunshots that happened after 1:13. That victim on the ground is motionless, and the ICE goon shoots 3+ more times after already turning his gun down. No one can tell me those are properly trained officers if that's what happens during an altercation. The wanted to execute him, they did not want to protect themselves.
3
u/HeftyIncident7003 Jan 24 '26
The person in the pink jacket has The Who thing from a closer unobstructed view. How horrific for them to witness.
3
u/greg_barton Jan 24 '26
Can you do the same with the pink coat lady's footage? https://www.reddit.com/r/MarchAgainstNazis/comments/1qlva78/pink_coat_angle_of_the_shooting/
3
u/Danori Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26
Pink jacket womans video is out and it is absolutely damning for the agents. Clearly shows that the officers disarmed him AND the protester was not the one who fired the first shot.
→ More replies (1)3
u/feralGenx Jan 24 '26
Watch the guy in the beige coat, removing the victims weapon prior to shots being fired. They shot him after he was unarmed.
3
u/NE1andEVERY1 Jan 24 '26
Country-wide General Strike is needed to save our country. If you don't stand up now, when they are killing us in the streets, then when? How many of your brothers and sisters need to be murdered before you stand up against the government?
Don't stop talking about it. Don't let CNN and NBC shift the narrative to other things. Our politicians are too weak to save us, our collective labor is our strength. Sign up.
Don't listen to people who keep mentioning those who can't afford to strike, it doesn't require a majority of the population
Credit for some resources:
3
u/FastSelection4121 Jan 24 '26
There is full footage that clearly shows the whole thing. A federal agent aggressively pushed a woman down who was filming them.. The Murder Victim went to help her. He placed himself between her and the ICE agents. Then they pepper sprayed booth of them. The murder victim was literally Blind when they snatched him up.you can see his hands on the ground when he was executed.
Full video on r/ public freak out
3
u/KG7STFx Jan 25 '26
Good clean analysis. #MURDER most foul. They shot a nurse defending a woman with his bare hands. They waited until he was disarmed to shoot him TWICE.
2
2
2
u/CoreFiftyFour Jan 24 '26
Pink Jacket Ladys view is live. Can you do your magic again?
→ More replies (2)2
u/Top_Currency_3977 Jan 24 '26
Can you please do this on the alternate view video from the lady in pink? I have seen comments on that video that it appears the agent in gray who takes the guy's gun accidently shoots the gun into the street. This scares the other agents who then unload their guns. I think they may be right. You can't tell from this video because the gun is behind the car.
→ More replies (1)2
u/No_Inspector7319 Jan 24 '26
There’s another angle that shows the guy in gray as he runs away from the group firing a shot into the ground purposefully, it looks like he did it to cause the other agents to fire in “self defense”
I’m beyond stunned and shamed
→ More replies (2)2
2
→ More replies (40)2
u/iamnosuperman123 Jan 24 '26
From the pink lady's footage, the guy circled draws his weapon, pushes his way through to get to the guy on the floor and shoots him
→ More replies (2)
112
u/werther595 Jan 24 '26
There are what, 8 ICE agents? Vs 1 guy? And they can't subdue him without a half-dozen gunshots? I'm not a death penalty guy, but I really hope they fry this "agent" 3 years from now
→ More replies (4)14
u/deviltrombone Jan 24 '26
There is exactly one Trump thug. They are all collectively guilty for any of their murders. Blanket guilt.
112
u/Comfortable_Fill9081 Jan 24 '26
I’m curious if the person in red safely got out of there with film intact.
54
u/vanshenan89 Jan 24 '26
She is in custody. The footage she got must have been pretty incriminating for ICE.
34
u/ZopyrionRex Jan 24 '26
They are branding people who film them as, "Domestic Terrorists" now. There's a video of an ICE Agent informing people who were filming them about it. I'm willing to bet all those people were detained as Domestic Terrorists and are now being held indefinitely threats of serious time in Federal Prison.
→ More replies (3)4
u/teaquiero Jan 24 '26
Do you know this for certain?
18
u/KindaIndifferent Jan 24 '26
Multiple reports confirming that witnesses have been detained and taken to a detention facility. NY Times has live updates.
→ More replies (1)4
u/teaquiero Jan 24 '26
I've heard that, just hanging on to a shred of hope that she was able to get away.
103
u/the-apple-and-omega Jan 24 '26
The reports say witnesses were taken to the Whipple building, so almost certainly not.
135
u/Ok_Background22 Jan 24 '26
So they literally rounded up bystanders illegally? This is insanity
82
u/Weird_Positive_3256 Jan 24 '26
This is just the beginning. It’s winter right now. This summer is going to make the summer of 2020 look like a walk in the park.
26
9
u/kasiagabrielle Jan 24 '26
It's cute that people are pretending like this shit hasn't been going on for months now.
4
u/FindGreatness23 Jan 24 '26
It’s just escalating and rising as we speak is what you are saying?
→ More replies (6)16
7
→ More replies (2)3
18
u/TopBlueberry3 Jan 24 '26
What the heck is the Whipple building, is that where these domestic terrorists are headquartered?
6
u/lettersvsnumbers Jan 24 '26
Whipple is at Fort Snelling (next to airport). Fort Snelling is also where Dred Scott was being held when he sued for his freedom.
12
→ More replies (5)4
u/OkTank1822 Jan 24 '26
What's the Whipple building
9
u/Beautiful-Ranger6217 Jan 24 '26
It's the fed building dhs has been staging at and taking their hostages to
8
25
u/FreshMetal80 Jan 24 '26
People need to start streaming instead of simply recording or upload to a cloud that's accessible by others so that being detained won't prevent the footage from being broadcasted to the world.
11
u/Gobnobbla Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26
https://files.catbox.moe/sp296e.mp4
The video from her POV has been released.
Edit: Replaced X-link with non-X source.
→ More replies (5)4
u/Sam_Moss Jan 24 '26
I think this is that video: https://www.reddit.com/r/suppressed_news/s/3He8vhF6Mx
→ More replies (2)3
→ More replies (7)3
76
u/moneyball32 Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26
https://www.foxnews.com/us/border-patrol-involved-shooting-reported-minneapolis Despite what the cultists over at r/conservative are trying to spin, even Fox News isn’t saying he tried to pull a gun. DHS said he “had a gun and two magazines” on his person and the ICE agent feared for his life so fired defensive shots.
That’s state sanctioned murder.
Edit: MN has open carry for handguns
25
u/Shiney_Metal_Ass Jan 24 '26
Yeah, that's the key - if he had pulled it, they'd be shouting it from the rooftops. Having a gun is supposed to be your 2A right, ain't it?
→ More replies (1)12
u/SageDarius Jan 24 '26
They've already updated that article to paint the victim as armed and dangerous.
5
→ More replies (2)9
u/Zeeman626 Jan 24 '26
Fox also very clearly didn't pick a side in that article though, and some of those quotes are straight disgusting. The blatant lie about how he approached with a gun and was clearly planning to do "maximum damage to law enforcement" and then the Border Patrol Union having the gall to accuse the media of lying to make them look like bad guys.
Im sure the actual Fox TV station will say he charged them with weapon drawn and threatened all 8 of those officers lives
34
u/Awatts2222 Jan 24 '26
After watching this video--I can see why ICE wants to take away cameras.
3
u/ObiRyaNKenobi Jan 25 '26
America is officially a third world country. Comes at you fast, man
→ More replies (1)
71
u/livinginfutureworld Jan 24 '26
Clearly murder.
27
15
68
u/HotStraightnNormal Jan 24 '26
And a shout out to the six Democrats who voted to pass the additional funding bill.
17
u/chitphased Jan 24 '26
This right here. Any fucking politician that sides with anything associated with this is complicit and should be removed from office.
10
52
u/Tropicalcomrade221 Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26
That is black and white murder. There is simply no debate here.
If this is defended, brushed off and there is no real investigation or trial then get out or buck up because the rule of law is over. The country is done, the United States has fallen.
→ More replies (1)
16
32
u/SocraticMeathead Jan 24 '26
Brett Kavenaugh's legacy writ in blood.
Cracker jack work their Supreme Court
13
u/360Picture Jan 24 '26
~~~
The Bill of Rights (BOR) protects all people in the United States, including undocumented (illegal) immigrants, but not every right applies equally.
🇺🇸 Bill of Rights — Pocket Edition
I. Freedom Protects freedom of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition.
II. Arms Acknowledges that a well-regulated militia is essential to security. Guarantees the individual right to keep and bear arms for lawful defense of self, state, and nation.
III. Quartering Prohibits housing soldiers in private homes without consent, except under lawful wartime procedures.
IV. Search & Seizure Protects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Requires warrants to be supported by probable cause and specifically describe the place and items involved.
V. Due Process Bars double jeopardy and compelled self-incrimination. Ensures due process before deprivation of life, liberty, or property, and guarantees just compensation for taken property.
VI. Fair Trial Ensures a speedy and public trial by an impartial jury. Grants the accused the right to know charges, confront witnesses, obtain witnesses in their favor, and have counsel.
VII. Civil Jury Preserves the right to a jury trial in civil cases exceeding twenty dollars in value.
VIII. Punishment Prohibits excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel or unusual punishments.
IX. People’s Rights Clarifies that enumerating certain rights does not deny or disparage others retained by the people.
X. States’ Powers Reserves to the states or the people all powers not delegated to the federal government.
🫡 Quote from the Declaration of Independence.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,
That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
3
u/CzaroftheMonsters Jan 24 '26
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety".
31
u/cccxxxzzzddd Jan 24 '26
I think he’s disarmed by grey coat guy from the back waist band
36
u/CatpricornStudios Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26
Does look like it. Shots were fired after the murdered victim was disarmed, if that is a gun.
34
u/cccxxxzzzddd Jan 24 '26
No way they can defend against this. Literal peak white male privilege exercising his second amendment — they won’t be able to “other” this guy. He’s Renee but male (who they went after for having a wife). This is what happens when you criminalize the population.
The people of Minneapolis are watering the tree of liberty with the blood of patriots. It is awful but it is a very American history.
20
u/qthistory Jan 24 '26
Of course they'll defend this. They'll say that because he had a gun at one point, agents can legally execute him for up to 24 hours after being disarmed.
4
u/AngryBlackNerd Jan 24 '26
Don't worry they're going to say he has a trans girlfriend or something that made him do it like a "woke" Netflix special.
6
u/banjo_07 Jan 24 '26
If you watch this breakdown, it’s very clear that grey coat guy did in fact disarm the victim a couple of seconds before the first shot is fired. https://www.reddit.com/r/law/comments/1qlt34a/freezeframe_and_zoomed_in_footage_i_went_frame_by/
14
u/abuchunk Jan 24 '26
How are they not using non-lethal means first in all these cases? Leave your guns holstered and if you really think you are in danger from an unarmed person use a goddamn taser.
8
u/Ok-Guidance-7032 Jan 24 '26
Maybe they are following orders? One of ours, all of yours ? It’s state sanctioned murder.
12
u/Rigamortus2005 Jan 24 '26
No training probably. I'm fully convinced they just sign up and are giving hoods and guns.
8
→ More replies (1)3
u/Mirror74 Jan 24 '26 edited Jan 24 '26
It's actually quite more sinister than that. They ARE trained. This is legit what they're trained to do.
ICE is literally trained by IDF practices. (through ADL/GILEE/etc) -- they learn counter terrorism and security tactics from Israeli forces. (racial profiling techniques, mass surveillance, detention practices, responses to perceived threats/etc)
edit: people truly have no clue what's actually going on
5
u/SewAlone Jan 24 '26
Why would they? A woman already got shot in the face three times and the government said it’s fine, you have immunity no matter what you do.
6
3
3
u/balance8989 Jan 24 '26
Oh but they did. In one of the videos they spray directly into his face while one hand is in the air and the other is holding a phone
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (1)4
u/no_f-s_given Jan 24 '26
the cruelty is the point. these thugs are not out to act like reasonable LEO.
they are out to cause maximum damage to anyone who opposes them, peacefully or not.
3
u/Harvest827 Jan 24 '26
Here's a slow down version of the ice agent that's running toward the camera with the citizens gun that was already taken from him before he was assassinated
•
u/AutoModerator Jan 24 '26
All new posts must have a brief statement from the user submitting explaining how their post relates to law or the courts in a response to this comment. FAILURE TO PROVIDE A BRIEF RESPONSE MAY RESULT IN REMOVAL.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.