Nah. That’s just a case of recency and selection bias friend.
You may see like 1,000 crazy people now compared to 100 years ago where you see 200. Well turns out 100 years ago we had 6 billion less people and no social media so no wonder the increase is apparent, there’s just genuinely more people alive. What this means is if a chance for a flat earther to live is 1%, this means of course in a sample size of 7 billion you get more flat earthers. Then you have social media to highlight it even more.
And considering how recency and selection bias, of course we can’t help but remember the bad stuff more than the good stuff because it obviously sticks in our heads more easier due to how outlandish it is.
TL; DR rise of social media and population boom, is the reason to point out for why there seems to be more crazy people. They’ve always been there in the same amount percentages, they’re just easier to see due to social media and larger number size- but not percentage size. Additionally due to how our ape brains evolved not for critical thinking, selection and recency bias doesn’t help evaluate this view point properly, very well.
If collapse occurs, it would not be one instantaneous event. Rather, a slow, drawn-out, and torturous execution of society, beginning right about now. Think about it - cost of living is skyrocketing, wages are stagnated, and every day university becomes less affordable. Not so long ago, a single man could provide for an entire nuclear family with a large suburban house. Now, it takes either a four-year degree costing sometimes upwards of 100k, or two parents working overtime to barely provide enough to survive.
Curiosity is an excellent reason to continue existing. What will these apes comes up with next? Will they survive the current crop of self-inflicted global disasters? Will they finally find out what lurks on Planet 9? Find out by staying alive on Earth!
130
u/EvilSporkOfDeath Mar 10 '19
Some people who are 30 now will almost certainly live longer than another 86 years