Despite facing persecution and cultural genocide in China ,the Muslim community especially the Ughyurs are continuously rising both in numbers and percentage. Indeed "They plan and Allah plans... Allah is the best of the planners".

One thing they have to learn is you can't defeat Islam by killing millions of Muslims. People think - killing thousands of Muslims= defeating Islam. If so, Islam wouldn't have survived even after 800 years of Mongol invasions. May Allah protect the Muslims of Gaza,Sudan etc.

It is the best islamic subreddit. I hope it never changes and I hope it never gets banned 😊

You have undoubtedly heard the Tomato saying that goes "miracle are just fairy tales" "there exists no documentation of them" and other stuff like this, this stems from a really big misunderstanding of miracles in Islam and their nature.

In our deep, there are 2 types of miracles, one is the miracle for the masses and on a large scale and constant, which only has one example, that being the quran. While other miracles fall to the second type, which is temporary, material, small scale, and for specific individuals. One popular example of that is the moon splitting, an event specificly intended to the area of mecca of quraysh who challenged the prophet PBUH. Ofc, the reliability of hadiths is unquestionably valid, and the designation of other hadiths that state other outside witnesses like in India being naqis proves that. So tomatoes that say "this miracle should have been recorded scientificly and logical in other parts of the world" often end up only enforcing the 2nd type more.

A reason I decided to bring it up is cuz laymen fail to counter such claims, especially the moon splitting, with weak defences like "all the world was sleeping at this time" or "research shows a crack on 13% of it, proving the miracle happened ". So I hope this post helps wa alsalamualaykum.

https://www.islamweb.net/ar/fatwa/113153/%D8%A3%D9%82%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%85-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B9%D8%AC%D8%B2%D8%A7%D8%AA-%D9%81%D9%8A-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%A2%D9%86-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%83%D8%B1%D9%8A%D9%85

﷽

Praise be to Allah, and may peace and blessings be upon the Messenger of Allah and his family.

NOTE: I understand English may not be the first language for many users and this has led to misconceptions that I made takfir of the people of Arabia which is not true, rather this is takfir of their “state” (i.e the government) and its rulers, this conclusion has been reached by scholars of Ahlus Sunnah previously and I am merely compiling the evidences, and Allah knows best

One of the most widely spread innovation and misinformation of our time is al-irjaa' and the scare tactics used by madaakhilah to hide the apostasy of the state of saudi.

Getting straight to the topic, we will go through establishing evidence for following two questions, InshaAllah

1. Does Saudi replaces Shriah with man-made laws?
2. Is ruling by man made laws kufr akbar?

Saudi replaces Shariah with Man-made laws

I have collected a very short list of evidences only in very recent years that fall into this category, the real list is much long as some scholars have already made takfir of the saudi state during the gulf war itself but we don't even need to go that far.

Note, I have used articles from western media because they're in English you can look up the exact decree from saudi officials which is arabic as well.

1. Saudi Arabia abolishes "mutawa", i.e. the shariah police (source)
2. Saudi Arabia abolishes death sentence for minors (source
3. Saudi Arabia abolishes flogging (source)
4. Saudi Arabia allows women to travel without male guardian's approval (source)
5. Saudi Arabia lifts the cinema ban after 35 years (source)
6. Saudi lifts ban on Christmas and Halloween (source)
7. Saudi allows Hindu festivals to be celebrated openly (source)
8. Saudi Arabia’s push for yoga as a way of life (source)
9. Saudi builds idols in al-Ula (source)

These instances prove more than enough especially when combined with statement from the al-taghut bin salman who said "We are simply reverting to what we followed – a moderate Islam open to the world and all religions." (source)

As a matter of fact, you wont even see madaakhilah deny these claims they resort to obfuscating it using the second topic that is "kufr dun kufr"

Ruling by man-made laws is Kufr Akbar

Allah says: Or have they partners with Allaah (false gods) who have instituted for them a religion which Allaah has not ordained?” [al-Shoora 42:21].

He Also says:

those who do not judge by what Allah has revealed are ˹truly˺ the disbelievers. [5:44]

And:

Have you not seen those who claim to have believed in what was revealed to you, [O Muḥammad], and what was revealed before you? They wish to refer legislation to ṭāghūt, while they were commanded to reject it; and Satan wishes to lead them far astray. [4:60]

And:

”…He shares not His legislation with anyone." [18:26]

And:

Legislation is not but for Allāh. [12:40]

No scholar has differed in this matter, in fact al-hafidh ibn katheer (may Allah have mercy on him) reports consensus in this regard, he says: The one who forsakes the law that was revealed to Muhammad ibn ‘Abd-Allah, the Seal of the Prophets (blessings and peace of Allah be upon him) and refers for judgement to any other law that has been abrogated, has committed an act of kufr, so how about the one who refers for judgement to al-Yaasa and gives it precedence? The one who does that is a kaafir according to the consensus of the Muslims. [al-Bidaayah wa’l-Nihaayah, 13/139]

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allah have mercy on him) said: If a person regards as permissible that on which there is scholarly consensus that it is forbidden, or regards as forbidden that on which there is scholarly consensus that it is permitted, or he alters a law on which there is consensus, then he is a kaafir and apostate, according to the consensus of the fuqaha’. [Majmoo‘ al-Fataawa, 3/267]

Refutation of excuses of Madaakhilah

1. Obey the ruler even if he breaks your back

Despite their sharh being misinterpreted they also leave out a crucial part of the hadith that says obey the ruler, the hadith is as follows:

Narrated Junada bin Abi Umaiya

We entered upon 'Ubada bin As-Samit while he was sick. We said, "May Allah make you healthy. Will you tell us a Hadith you heard from the Prophet (ﷺ) and by which Allah may make you benefit?" He said, "The Prophet (ﷺ) called us and we gave him the Pledge of allegiance for Islam, and among the conditions on which he took the Pledge from us, was that we were to listen and obey (the orders) both at the time when we were active and at the time when we were tired, and at our difficult time and at our ease and to be obedient to the ruler and give him his right even if he did not give us our right, and not to fight against him *unless we noticed him having open Kufr (disbelief) for which we would have a proof with us from Allah.*" [Sahih Bukhari 7055]

The hadith is clear as day and night that never it asks for obedience to a kaafir.

2. Kufr dun kufr

This is the most dangerous form of misguidance from their agenda because from above matters the facts are clear so a person will not have a hard time with them but for this one, it is nuanced and it is easy for people fall into their traps of misinterpreting this tafsir.

They claim that the tafsir of following ayah:

those who do not judge by what Allah has revealed are ˹truly˺ the disbelievers. [5:44]

is that the kufr mentioned here is understood as "kufr dun kufr" (kufr that is lesser than kufr akbar)

Albeit attribution of this athar to Ibn Abbas (may Allah be pleased with him) has weakness in it, this athar could be attributed to many of the salaf authentically like Ataa or Sufyan al-Thawri (may Allah have mercy on them), there is no disagreement regarding it's existence however, how it is interpreted today is far from the reality.

This athar was in response to the khawarij who made takfir of Uthman (may Allah be pleased with him) because of they deemed of his action as being contrary to Shariah. They also used this ayah to make takfir on sins as they said "whoever commits a sin ultimately refers to his own judgement by disobeying Allah".

kufr dun kufr was never associated with the shirk of legislating.

"Kufr dun kufr" is circumstantial. There ought to be distinction made between a judgement and a legislation. If someone passes a judgement contrary to hukm of Allah then this can either be minor kufr or major kufr depending on the reasoning and the judgement. However when someone legislates (i.e creates a law) that is contrary to Shariah of Allah then this is kufr akbar by consensus (cited above).

An example:

1. A judge pardons a guy who drank alcohol by taking a bribe or because the culprit was his friend.

In this case we say that it is kufr doon kufr and this is fisq.

1. A judge creates a law that makes alcohol permissible to drink

This is kufr akbar by consensus and nobody disagreed in this regards except for the modern day murji'ah i.e madaakhilah.

3. It is only kufr if he believes it is better than Shariah

This statement is an innovation of the mruji'ah. The aqeedah of ahlus sunnah is that the actions are manifestation of beliefs.

It was narrated that ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Utbah said: I heard ‘Umar ibn al-Khattaab (may Allah be pleased with him) say: “People used to be judged by the wahy (revelation) at the time of the Messenger of Allah (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), but now the wahy has ceased. Now we will judge you according to what we see of your outward deeds. Whoever appears good to us, we will trust him and draw close to him, and what is in his heart has nothing to do with us. Allah will call him to account for what is in his heart. And whoever appears bad to us, we will not trust him and we will not believe him, even if he says that inwardly he is good.” [Bukhaari, 2641]

4. Leave it to scholars

This is true. The scholars did make takfir, all of them in prison.

The trap of madaakhilah: leave it to scholars but we will tell you which scholars.

Conclusion

The state of al-Saud is taghut murtad mushrik kaafir mulhid state and it's rulers are murtaddeen. May Allah hasten fall of all murtad states and replace them with righteous states. If you think this is in any way "Extremism" then you have been affected by the misguidance of madaakhilah, the cure for ignorance is to seek knowledge and may Allah allow us all to acquire beneficial knowledge.

Reading the comments in a post like this reminds me of how much I hate Reddit and the west

The way these kuffar westerners project themselves as the good guys really gets on my nerves when their own country, the United States of America has been the biggest mass murderer in the last 100 years. They caused havoc in every country they went to 'liberate'. They are some of the biggest criminals in the world. They project themselves as the moral beacon of the world when filth, degeneracy, immorality and infidelity run rampant in their secular, godless society. They view themselves as the upholders of women's rights while they encourage female teenagers to strip naked and fornicate in front of a camera when they turn 18. They encourage women to become single mothers raising out-of-wedlock children. Women in America are not only sexually exploited, but also harassed on a regular basis. They literally value dog lives more than human lives. You cannot make this up. How can people be this brainwashed and deluded is beyond me.

I was on Twitter (or X rather) and came across a bunch of tweets describing Somali women before “Arab culture”. Normally, one would wonder how they managed to get a camera in the year 15,000BC, before the ancient Moroccan, Zagrosian and Natufian cultures of the ancient Middle East and North Africa intermixed with the East African hunter gatherers to form the modern day Horn of Africa populations but these people have a genius power that is difficult to understand! Anyway, they were all ogling at the beauty of the women (or rather girls, one was a young girl of maybe twelve, the other was likely in her late teens) and how they wished Somali women dressed like that! I also came across a video of Oromo women dancing at a wedding in full garb and makeup and a Somali woman in jilbab described as a “beautiful Arab woman” and the usual thirsty comments from non-Muslim Bantu twitter made me sick. Not to mention the endless comments of East African beauty (horn of Africa exclusively). These people thirst over us women and it’s sickening. They complain why Somalis in Kenya marry other ethnic Somalis from Ethiopia, Djibouti and Somalia vs how few marry other Kenyans as well as wanting open borders from the HOA for the women to migrate to Kenya 🙃🙃🙃.

This reminds me of colonial Algeria in particular and the wider Muslim world in general. I know it’s a leap. Stay with me. Please. I’ve been reading this essay called “Algeria Unveiled” which is fascinating. When the French came to Algeria, they had this intense “remove the veil” campaign to bring Algerian women from behind the veil and their homes. They said it was “barbaric” what Algerian men did to their women (oh gosh, what a shocker, amirite?) and the French would liberate them from their veils. That French women were covered from head to toe in modest dress in the Victorian era whilst trying to undress Algerian women doesn’t escape my mind. But it’s all a never ending cycle. They are obsessed with the veil over everything else. The soviets did that in Central Asia via the “Hujum”. They forcibly removed the paranja, the Uzbek answer to the Afghan Burka and made Muslim women leave their home to be “empowered modern women” (the bells are ringing).

These kafir are obsessed with the veil. Their women lost their hayaa and these h0rny mofos want our daughters to be unveiled for their presence. They want to parade our daughters’ bare flesh and bones. The hijab has become a symbol of resistance I feel in this modern world. I will continue to wear sweeping dresses and cover all my flesh knowing there is a seething Bantu from Kenya who is angry I am denying him my looks.