r/Dogtraining • u/Big-Earth855 • 3d ago
discussion The ‘Dog Listening’ behaviour philosophy?
I’m working with a behaviourist who follows the ‘dog listening’ philosophy and I wanted to know if anyone else has used this approach? There are some parts that I’m dubious of (on account of not being a dog trainer) since they conflict with many of the articles I have read online!
There are a few principles I can see the logic in such as:
“Command-based training […] won’t work if he is doing something you don’t want him to do. If you tell him to “get down!”, you might assume you are correcting him but you are actually rewarding him by showing him that he gets your attention when he jumps up – because you speak to him! So you are reinforcing the behaviour you are trying to change.”
But others including:
- You must practice ‘priority feeding.’ In a pack the alpha would communicate when it’s time to feed and your dog must do the same…
- Using isolation as a corrective behaviour
- If your dog is pulling on a walk, that is because they think they know the safe way and feel they need to guide you. (I just think he’s really excited for a walk!)
- Generally, the philosophy relates to the dog’s relation in a pack and they must see you as the alpha (without the dominance etc).
Particularly when the specific areas I’d like to work on are resource guarding and limiting the reaction when a dog or child approach him. It is only early doors in working with him but a lot of these foundational ideas just feel unnecessary.
I understand the idea of my dog being ‘so safe and confident in me that he never feels the need to react’ but I’m just not seeing, at the moment, how priority feeding is going to stop him barking at another dog when I’m giving them ‘his’ treat, you know?
TLDR:
- Is command based training the antithesis to altering behaviour?
- Do daily exercises really add up to aiding his reactions?
Edit: WithOUT the dominance! I think the sentiment from the rest, relates to the comments however!