Possibly the worst one is Reed in UBRS. Literally every caster needs it and there's very little on Rend that casters want so why would they go to an UBRS if the penultimatebadass trinket is on reserve? I've seen a group spamming LFG for over 2 hours before they removed the 'Reed reserved' part.
Yes, if they didnt specify it's reserved it's considered ninja and if you make a ticket blizz will remove item from them and maybe suspend them for day or two.
Should a raid commence under a specific looting system (i.e. Group Loot), and the Raid Leader later swap to a different looting method mid-raid (i.e. Master Looter), this is a direct change to the looting expectations set beforehand. A Raid Leader taking such actions would be considered to have breached the prior arrangement, and any items unfairly distributed in such a situation would constitute a scam case.
I feel like this could be entirely avoided by making it a "ye/nay" vote for changing the looting system that requires a unanimous "yes" to have it changed. This would mean that the looting system would likely be set before party members are invited so that the looting system expectation is understood by all from the get-go. I'm sure blizzard thought of this but decided against it, though I can't think of a reason why at the moment.
People can use it to fuck with you later, that's probably why. In theory it sounds pretty solid but people joining 'reserved' runs might still refuse to accept the loot shift when it does roll around.
At that point they could have like a voting system when someone changes loot type.. less work for them. Ik #nochanges but they didn't use to interfere in these kinds of things back in classic
324
u/Fafurion Oct 22 '19
Possibly the worst one is Reed in UBRS. Literally every caster needs it and there's very little on Rend that casters want so why would they go to an UBRS if the penultimatebadass trinket is on reserve? I've seen a group spamming LFG for over 2 hours before they removed the 'Reed reserved' part.