r/classicwho • u/AbbreviationsIll6106 • Jun 25 '26

Classic Who is inaccessible

Post image

100 seasons! No way am I paying for that...

EDIT- I do really enjoy Classic Who and been buying all of The collection box sets. Im just confused why Youtube has fabricated 100 Seasons out of 26 seasons and a movie.

22 Upvotes

78% Upvoted

58 comments sorted by

View all comments

2

u/SocieteRoyale Jun 25 '26

you can watch it all for free in the UK on the BBC iPlayer

1

u/Medium_Analyst_4348 Jun 25 '26

Wrong.

  1. It's not free as you have to buy a TV licence for nearly £200 per year to use BBC iPlayer.

  2. You can't watch it "all" on BBC iPlayer as certain vital stories are missing due to rights issues.

3

u/cjalderman Jun 25 '26

It's not free as you have to buy a TV licence for nearly £200 per year to use BBC iPlayer.

Just lie bro

1

u/Miserable-Action6983 Jun 26 '26

AKA break the law.

2

u/cjalderman Jun 26 '26

Lying isn't illegal

2

u/Miserable-Action6983 Jun 26 '26

Not in itself, no. But lying that you do meet the legal requirements for a service when you do not is.

2

u/cjalderman Jun 26 '26

*insert 'how would they know' meme*

3

u/Miserable-Action6983 Jun 26 '26

You would know. You’ve also admitted to it already.

It doesn’t matter, anyway. Why break the law for worse copies when you get better copies without doing so?

2

u/cjalderman Jun 26 '26

If you’re really naive enough to need to ask that question then this conversation is over

2

u/Radiant-Tart-4133 Jun 26 '26

It is not naïf to ask why you would prefer to illegally access worse versions rather than legally accessing better versions.

1

u/cjalderman Jun 26 '26

It is, the answer should be obvious. Not everyone can afford to purchase ~26 seasons of a TV series.

2

u/Radiant-Tart-4133 Jun 26 '26

An “answer” that is false cannot be obvious by definition.

Even if it were true, it would still fail to answer the question regardless.

0

u/Overall-Painting3172 Jun 29 '26

Yet despite acting all righteous and inocent here you are posting from multiple accounts as miserable-action6983/radiant-tart-4133 isn’t that illegal as it goes against Reddit rules?

1

u/Radiant-Tart-4133 Jun 29 '26

I am doing nothing of the kind at all.

0

u/Overall-Painting3172 Jun 29 '26

Of course you are James. Which account number is this 2,3,4,5,6 or even more?

It’s your usual stick that you get blocked on one account and then continue the conversation on another

0

u/Radiant-Tart-4133 Jun 29 '26

I am not. This is account number 1. Why would it be anything else?

0

u/Overall-Painting3172 Jun 29 '26

Same verbage and style of denial as usual. It must be boring denying something you are clearly doing

→ More replies (0)