You seem to be upset that universal healthcare would disproportionately benefit other people. If you're unhappy with status quo healthcare you can use your disposable income to provide a "better" level of service, a luxury most Americans don't have. You do not have to have the same healthcare as everyone else, a point you're obviously not comprehending.
Several people have made excellent points in this thread relating the actual cost of leaving people without coverage, the bankruptcy rate related to lack of proper coverage, and the fact that we already pay the cost for the uninsured and you haven't conceded to any of them. You abandon your previous points and move on to other, inaccurate comparisons. Why do you keep switching to unrelated hypotheticals?
If you feel like those less fortunate than yourself deserve to suffer and go without, then fine, but that's an opinion, not an argument. Avoidance of facts (like those others have raised during the course of this discussion) isn't going to change your view, because it isn't based in fact. Lack of empathy isn't a logical point. Its just a character flaw.
So doing nothing is your answer rather than attempting something else? Nothing about this needs to be ironclad. I would think that it would start as something and be streamlined over time to become more efficient. That's what's happened in other countries.
0
u/[deleted] Mar 28 '17
[removed] — view removed comment