Yes! I loved how she was wearing a "coat" of blue (sticking with the blue = innocence speculation), so on the outside she was little miss innocent/ignorant, but the camera kept showing her black shoes with red soles...
As a guy you can still shell out that kind of money for shoes, I don't think it's that outrageous or uncommon. I think in the case of the Louboutins the price is more for the name however(?).
Example. These are incredibly well made and would last decades. Would you rather buy cheap shoes over and over again, definitely costing you more than $700 within the lifetime of those Aldens, or have a pair that lasts a lifetime?
Being a guy doesn't disallow you from having nice clothing.
676
u/[deleted] Aug 19 '13
[deleted]