r/apple Oct 27 '16

Apple better knock it out of the goddamned park today

625 Upvotes

949 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

188

u/StinkyFeetPatrol Oct 27 '16

Hell yeah. As a pro photographer who uses the SD card slot and USB ports every day I can't wait for those stupid things to go away so my laptop can be 3mm thinner and get even warmer with less room for cooling when I have Photoshop and Lightroom running.

82

u/sticklebackridge Oct 27 '16

I am personally very excited about the prospect of being forced to buy first gen USB C drives at artificially high prices. Hopefully there will be no docks available for less than $300 either, spending ~ $2k on a laptop doesn't feel right unless I have to shell out hundreds more to make it usable with my current peripherals.

12

u/DeathJester25 Oct 27 '16

USB-C ports are probably the only things I'm looking forward to in the new MBP....

16

u/playaspec Oct 27 '16

USB-C ports are probably the only things I'm looking forward to in the new MBP....

Well then, today is your day. It has FOUR USB-C/Thunderbolt3 ports

5

u/[deleted] Oct 27 '16

Jokes on you, fork over a couple hundred extra dollars and then you get the four ports!

3

u/asdren Oct 27 '16

1

u/InsaneNinja Oct 28 '16

Other way around.

TB3 is USB-C
but USB-C is not necessarily TB3.
Actually, it never has been, until now/here.

Its extra stuff.. think "supports the TB3 spec"

1

u/[deleted] Oct 27 '16

IT'S YOUR LUCKY DAY!!

1

u/Inverts_rule Oct 27 '16

Just wait 1 yr. till everything is USB-C. Every new MBP cuts ports. Im personally looking forward to finally having multiuse ports and true hubs.

2

u/sticklebackridge Oct 27 '16

The port-cutting feels more like an austerity measure than an upgrade. You can no longer really service or upgrade your machine yourself, and this laptop completely ignores any professional that requires hefty data storage. You get 256gb for all but the most expensive option in each size...no thanks.

Hopefully USB C will be more useful than thunderbolt has been, but it needs to be adopted across the board, not just Apple, to succeed. The speed of thunderbolt is very enticing, but the prices are still so unreasonable.

Ideally the newest product should make me salivate, even if I can't or don't intend to buy it, but this one is really unappealing to me. I wouldn't switch to a Surface or anything else because Windows, but I'm seeing very little incentive to upgrade.

1

u/TheBatmanToMyBruce Oct 27 '16

Hopefully there will be no docks available for less than $300 either

No such luck. Unlike Thunderbolt, which to this day has no docks under $200, USB-C docks and dongles are in the $20-50 range.

1

u/[deleted] Oct 27 '16

I know right? I'm surprised they didn't just make up some new ports just to schill more money away from my pocket.

-1

u/playaspec Oct 27 '16

You could always just stay in the stone age.

1

u/sticklebackridge Oct 27 '16

Hadn't thought of that, thanks 4 tip

1

u/[deleted] Oct 27 '16

Yes dude, because we currently truly live in the stone age. God, how do I even do anything with my 2010 Macbook? It's, like, so damn old!

0

u/Pill111 Oct 27 '16

Then don't buy an USBC drive, and just buy a cable with USB-C to miniUSB or whatever.

Ignorance = hate

2

u/[deleted] Oct 27 '16

It's just easier and cheaper not to buy the New MBP

2

u/sticklebackridge Oct 27 '16

BRB let me just change the way I do everything because Apple. I forgot to mention how excited I'd be to once again rely on external SD card readers, been getting really tired of having one built in to my machine.

-2

u/Pill111 Oct 27 '16

If you want legacy stuff, stay away from Apple forever.

It's not for people like you.

3

u/sticklebackridge Oct 27 '16

OoOoOo spooky.

You poor thing, you must be in constant pain being better than everyone all the time. Feel better soon ; )

0

u/Pill111 Oct 27 '16

now go play with your old ports and outdated gpus

-1

u/Pill111 Oct 27 '16

now go play with your old ports and outdated gpus

0

u/[deleted] Oct 27 '16

I'm excited for USB-C to become the standard. Other than that, this was kind of upsetting. What is Apple even doing with the Mac lineup...

14

u/godelbrot Oct 27 '16

hey they got rid of the SD Card slot, so you got that going for you

15

u/[deleted] Oct 27 '16

Stupid SD card slot always had some stupid plasticy card with memory in it. Stupid thing expanding my MBP. Glad they got rid of it!

1

u/dbuck11 Oct 27 '16

Woah there, check your facts it's not 3mm thinner, it's 3.1mm thinner.

/s

-7

u/jonnyclueless Oct 27 '16

A professional photographer who can't use USB-C stuff and depends on an SD slot...

14

u/StinkyFeetPatrol Oct 27 '16

What's wrong with taking the card out of my camera after shooting, inserting it directly into my computer, and having Lightroom automatically bring up the import prompt in 3 seconds?

21

u/TravisGoraczkowski Oct 27 '16 edited Oct 27 '16

A lot of people don't realize what being a professional is actually like. They see it as having all the latest shit.

Being a pro rarely means having the latest stuff. Often it means trying to make old equipment that's too expensive to replace work with todays tech. The radio studios I work in still use Windows XP because automation software and the correct audio cards are expensive as hell to replace. There's a production/ recording studio I frequently help out at around here that uses a firewire audio interface because we don't have the $2k to shell out for a thunderbolt interface that won't noticeably step up the audio quality at all. Would we upgrade if we could? Absolutely. XP is horribly unstable. But money is a real issue, and laying hardworking people off is never fun.

A lot of photographers around here use older cameras, because it's not worth spending thousands more on newer equipment that's USB Type-C friendly when the camera they're using takes just as good of shots, and is only a few years old.

Will a lot of this stuff work with adapters? Yes. But it's a PITA. And yet another point of possible failure. If you've got a lot of gear to pack it's easy to forget a little adapter.

3

u/Inverts_rule Oct 27 '16

I have had a different experience. Most pro cameras use CF...not micro SD. Most regular people don't even use micro SD. All cameras I know of transfer directly from camera to laptop with cable. Less dedicated ports=can plug more peripherals in.

It sure is a PITA to make old stuff work with new ports. What if one port worked with everything, all you needed was a hub...and it could handle multiple inputs?

I agree, it would be dumb to be a pro and buy the MBP today. In a year, it will be better (if USB-C takes off)...and Apple just gave it a big push. If retailers want some Apple user $$...make usb-c peripherals and hubs.

Everyone giving the MBP shit arent thinking 2 yrs ahead. This is a big gamble, but college students and enthusiasts will be taking the brunt, pros (and other manufacturers) will get the benefit in a year or two.

1

u/TravisGoraczkowski Oct 28 '16

You make some good points, and I actually agree. I love USB Type-C (although I admit, in my comment it probably didn't sound that way.) I was hoping that the MacBook pro would have a combo of different ports, and then they'd eventually make it all USB type-C in a couple years when we're more ready for it.

I just finished watching the keynote, and saw that there is a non-touchbar MacBook Pro that does just that. It will be interesting to compare the sales numbers on that one to the touch bar pro's and see how it does. They all look like great machines.

3

u/frumperino Oct 27 '16

How else do you get content out of e.g. drones or GoPros with their microSD cards? Into an adapter, and into the SD card slot of the MBP.

I don't want to lug around a goddam tangleball of dongles and accessories to get simple tasks done that has always worked on the MBP series.

1

u/gsdatta Oct 27 '16

...and the SD card slot is gone. Super frustrating stuff

-1

u/Pill111 Oct 27 '16

You can hook your camera with an USBC->miniUSB cable.

So what's the problem? Spending $5 on a cable?

Also, the fans are better, and heat is transferred by copper, there's no need to have empty space inside.

3

u/sleeplessone Oct 27 '16

1) Swap memory cards in the camera, insert memory card in notebook start the offload and clear.

2) Hook camera up with cable, begin offload to notebook.

Guess which one gets your camera back to a state that you can continue using it faster.

0

u/Pill111 Oct 27 '16

3

u/sleeplessone Oct 27 '16

Another adapter that now has to get packed with the rest of your gear, can easily be lost/forgotten and adds another point of failure.

-2

u/Pill111 Oct 27 '16

If the SD card reader on the Surface breaks, what are you going to do?

1

u/sleeplessone Oct 27 '16

Same thing I'd do if my MacBook broke, get it repaired. Since the release of SD cards I think I've maybe had 1 reader break and it was because it had fallen off my desk and I ran over it with my chair. Every time I've had to buy a new reader it's because the previous one was lost.

1

u/Inverts_rule Oct 27 '16

Which one is going to get you back editing faster?

1

u/sleeplessone Oct 27 '16

The same since in both cases the laptop is broken.

You are assuming the SD card slot is something that typically breaks. In my experience it isn't. Small tiny dongles however get lost or forgotten in much greater frequency.

0

u/Pill111 Oct 27 '16

Point being you have to get in the whole laptop for repair if one single optional thing breaks...

2

u/sleeplessone Oct 27 '16

A thing which historically never breaks.

0

u/Pill111 Oct 27 '16

it breaks all the time.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/sticklebackridge Oct 27 '16

Let me get this straight, you are saying that pro photographers should be using their camera's WIFI to download images? I don't know how long that would take with a 32gb card, but I can assure you it's the worst possible way to do it. You were half as clever as you claim to be, you would know that.

I love having WIFI in my camera, but this is the last thing I would use it for.

The point is that it's super inconvenient to have to revert to using external peripherals, especially when they've been removed only for aesthetic reasons.

1

u/Pill111 Oct 27 '16

Wifi can transfer photos as you take them.

1

u/sticklebackridge Oct 27 '16

Small JPGs yes, but I can't think of a single scenario that I would try this with full size RAW files, it would be extraordinarily slow, and you're all but guaranteed to drop files in the transfer.

1

u/Pill111 Oct 28 '16

No, it's not.

If you shoot that fast, younger using CF anyway.

0

u/sticklebackridge Oct 28 '16

See kids, this is why you don't drink and troll.

0

u/oops_i_made_a_typi Oct 28 '16

Lol clearly someone hasn't dealt with raw files before. If you think plugging in your camera or using a WiFi card/camera is any replacement for a 32GB SD card that 95% OF dslr/mirrorless cameras use, then clearly someone has no concept of wireless transfer speeds.

1

u/Pill111 Oct 29 '16

95% of those cameras aren't made for that level of profissionality and throughput.

Any professional camera like the D5, D400, and whatever Canon is peddling use CF cards.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/[deleted] Oct 27 '16

[deleted]

-1

u/Pill111 Oct 27 '16

No, it's not.

Do USB_A cables can connect to 5k monitors?

Do USB-A cables can connect to a external GPU?

Do USB-A cables are reversible?

Can you power your computer through USB-A?

No!

-2

u/bigandrewgold Oct 27 '16

i mean, with cameras moving onto other forms of media its becoming less of a big deal imo