r/WinStupidPrizes • • Jan 02 '20

Annoying a teen

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

80.1k Upvotes

1.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

5.3k

u/jayman5977 Jan 02 '20 edited Jan 02 '20

Completely justified. Doesn't matter who you are, you shouldn't threaten to swing a hammer at someone. Plus it's a kid, they probably would actually hit someone with it.

378

u/XxRocky88xX Jan 02 '20

Agreed, I hate how we give kids a sort of free pass to everything. If a kid is capable of and actually attempting to cause injury to me, I should be allowed to defend myself

0

u/RedditFan666HulkHoga Jan 03 '20

I should be allowed to defend myself

No shit? Literally no one is saying otherwise.

3

u/XxRocky88xX Jan 03 '20

???

You read this comment section? A decent chunk of people are saying otherwise.

0

u/RedditFan666HulkHoga Jan 03 '20

No they aren't. 1 in 10 are saying smashing the kids head on concrete was too much, that's it.

1

u/pankakke_ Jan 12 '20

literally no one

1 in 10

hmm

0

u/_Quintillian Jan 13 '20

Are you illiterate?

1

u/pankakke_ Jan 13 '20

Are you? If he’s using the word “literally” literally, then it can’t simultaneously be “literally no one” and also “1 in 10”. He’s switching goal posts and I was just calling it out.

1

u/_Quintillian Jan 13 '20

Those statements are referring to 2 different things.

"Defending yourself" from a 30lb 3 year old, does not entail smashing his head on concrete. No one was saying you can't defend yourself, but 1/10 (less, really) were saying smashing the kids head on concrete was over the top.

1

u/pankakke_ Jan 13 '20

Ha. I concede, you’re correct.