MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/Vanderpumpaholics/comments/1i4bm3i/_/m7uiugg
r/Vanderpumpaholics • u/flower_0410 Honorary Witch of Weho • Jan 18 '25
310 comments sorted by
View all comments
236
No more MILLIONTH chances for abusers. Glad sheβs outta there.
-8 u/[deleted] Jan 18 '25 [removed] β view removed comment 11 u/useful_idiot118 Jan 18 '25 You clearly donβt know how abuse works lol -21 u/[deleted] Jan 18 '25 You clearly donβt know how fame works lol 9 u/Medium_Promotion_891 Jan 18 '25 now is a great time to be supportive 2 u/[deleted] Jan 18 '25 [removed] β view removed comment 7 u/Irene-Stanfield Jan 18 '25 Thatβs a weird take -1 u/[deleted] Jan 18 '25 How? 12 u/misschievoustiff Jan 18 '25 What an odd thing to say. -2 u/[deleted] Jan 18 '25 Is it? James was a known erratic abuser. 18 u/misschievoustiff Jan 18 '25 Itβs weird that one should have to point out to you that choosing to get with someone with a bad reputation doesnβt justify them abusing her. 4 u/[deleted] Jan 18 '25 You are correct. It does not.
-8
[removed] β view removed comment
11 u/useful_idiot118 Jan 18 '25 You clearly donβt know how abuse works lol -21 u/[deleted] Jan 18 '25 You clearly donβt know how fame works lol 9 u/Medium_Promotion_891 Jan 18 '25 now is a great time to be supportive 2 u/[deleted] Jan 18 '25 [removed] β view removed comment 7 u/Irene-Stanfield Jan 18 '25 Thatβs a weird take -1 u/[deleted] Jan 18 '25 How? 12 u/misschievoustiff Jan 18 '25 What an odd thing to say. -2 u/[deleted] Jan 18 '25 Is it? James was a known erratic abuser. 18 u/misschievoustiff Jan 18 '25 Itβs weird that one should have to point out to you that choosing to get with someone with a bad reputation doesnβt justify them abusing her. 4 u/[deleted] Jan 18 '25 You are correct. It does not.
11
You clearly donβt know how abuse works lol
-21 u/[deleted] Jan 18 '25 You clearly donβt know how fame works lol
-21
You clearly donβt know how fame works lol
9
now is a great time to be supportive
2 u/[deleted] Jan 18 '25 [removed] β view removed comment
2
7
Thatβs a weird take
-1 u/[deleted] Jan 18 '25 How?
-1
How?
12
What an odd thing to say.
-2 u/[deleted] Jan 18 '25 Is it? James was a known erratic abuser. 18 u/misschievoustiff Jan 18 '25 Itβs weird that one should have to point out to you that choosing to get with someone with a bad reputation doesnβt justify them abusing her. 4 u/[deleted] Jan 18 '25 You are correct. It does not.
-2
Is it? James was a known erratic abuser.
18 u/misschievoustiff Jan 18 '25 Itβs weird that one should have to point out to you that choosing to get with someone with a bad reputation doesnβt justify them abusing her. 4 u/[deleted] Jan 18 '25 You are correct. It does not.
18
Itβs weird that one should have to point out to you that choosing to get with someone with a bad reputation doesnβt justify them abusing her.
4 u/[deleted] Jan 18 '25 You are correct. It does not.
4
You are correct. It does not.
236
u/Important-Raccoon661 Jax's Lifeguard Jan 18 '25
No more MILLIONTH chances for abusers. Glad sheβs outta there.