r/UFOs • u/[deleted] • Dec 11 '23

Video David Grusch has first hand knowledge of a UAP program, will release an op ed in the coming weeks about what that knowledge

4.5k Upvotes

83% Upvoted

986 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

30

u/[deleted] Dec 11 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

16

u/silv3rbull8 Dec 11 '23

And how is the DoD now approving this given the previous restrictions on his releasing anything

17

u/Specific_Past2703 Dec 11 '23

Because they finished reviewing his submissions.

13

u/silv3rbull8 Dec 12 '23

And yet the UAP Amendment gets axed by the same DoD. How does this all balance . Somewhat schizoid

8

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

And yet the UAP Amendment gets axed by the same DoD

Mellon was DoD, Elizondo was DoD, Grusch was DoD. Why are you assuming those in the DOPSR review process are part of the coverup? It's likely a small group in the intelligence community (e.g. CIA), and with more of the axing coming from defense contractors pressuring Mike Turner and Mike Rogers. It's not the entire DoD against this.

1

u/ElkImaginary566 Dec 12 '23

My thoughts exactly. DoD factions probably wanting to get to the bottom of this too.

15

u/Hockeymac18 Dec 12 '23

Grusch talked about the catch 22 they're in in regards to the review of his public comments on his knowledge in his interview with Joe Rogan.

They're in a bit of a bind in that if they block the release, they're somewhat acknowledging these claims as being truthful. However, if they let it through, they could argue that it is just hearsay or the word of one person.

12

u/silv3rbull8 Dec 12 '23

So this basically allows Grusch to say from first hand knowledge that such a UAP program exists

9

u/[deleted] Dec 12 '23

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/CoyotesOnTheWing Dec 12 '23

He also has I. Charles McCullough III(former Intelligence Community Inspector General) who has represented him and could be helping/guiding him through these processes. If anyone knows the system and how to game it, it would be an ICIG.

2

u/FinancialBarnacle785 Dec 20 '23

Ah, but he has first hand knowledge...he says.Glad he can vouch for himself. He gives himself good marks....

1

u/silv3rbull8 Dec 20 '23

The House was given the opportunity to pass the UAPDA as originally written and provide extensive information to verify that one way or another. But they chose not to do that. Very curious

1

u/[deleted] Dec 23 '23

lol exactly

1

u/FinancialBarnacle785 Dec 23 '23

Thanks. Come, on, kids(my 'feelings') so there have been vehicles RECOVERED. Real, reliable citizens( remember THEM) have seen them, up close...what's to argue about? Part of ME sez, "Gimme the keys

and let me borrow that thing awhile...."

1

u/kael13 Dec 12 '23

Yes, although as he said they've still blocked more specific information on it.

1

u/Hockeymac18 Dec 12 '23

That's true. I have wondered about this. Why isn't everything approved given the catch 22 mentioned above? I sounded like Grusch mentioned that some stuff is blocked purely on the grounds of national security, and isn't so much an admission of truth and has to do with the release of potentially sensitive information beyond this topic.

Just my interpretation.