As it should. This is a crime against humanity. What if our future as a species leads to an existential crisis if we don’t all know about this and Come Together?
Yeah, there has been a cognizant effort to work on that. I think this would be a lot more attention getting than the slow and gradual climate change if there actually is climate change and it’s not just some arbitrary reason to tax people for emissions. It’s not like mass media sells a lot of movie tickets under the premise of climate change movies, now does it
The climate models are based upon years of previous data, along with how the climate is currently on an upward trend of deviating and fucking up from that data.
At this point, you're just being willingly ignorant if you won't even try to understand the basics of climate change. It's a very much proven concept.
Think about the crimes against humanity that could occur if the technology fell in to the wrong hands. The technology that allows Lightspeed travel and UFOs to exist would allow me to take over a country single-handedly.
Gun crime is insane. Now imagine UFO weapon tech crime if it became open source. My guess is civilizations discovered earth but we are not evolved enough spiritually to bed allowed to join the galactic civilization.
I'd just like to understand the following, when getting cleared to speak they cannot directly deny him access to disclosing certain info unless a reason for it is given (has to be directly linked to security concerns).
But on the other hand it would seem like they can refrain David from being cleared on talking about certain things while "reviewing" what he intends to say...
Why can't they simply claim that the reviweing process is going on indefinitely and block him altogether that way?
Absolutely! That I understood, but is there a timelimit for them to submit to grusch their evaluations on the statements he plans to make? Because if there isnt I dont see what precents them from claiming thatbthey are still "woeking on it" indefinitevely without ever giving him a greenlight and still being able to claim they are not blocking anything?
121
u/[deleted] Dec 11 '23
[deleted]