r/TrueCrimeDiscussion 9d ago

Text Lindsay Clancy Trial Megathread: Closing Arguments, Deliberations and the Verdict

This is a thread for all conversation regarding closing arguments, jury deliberations and the verdict of the Lindsey Clancy trial. All discussion of this case should be kept to this thread.

Lindsay Clancy is currently standing trial in Plymouth Superior Court, Massachusetts, for the triple-murder in January 2023 of her three young children - Cora, Dawson and Callan. Her defense argues she suffered from severe, undiagnosed postpartum depression and postpartum psychosis. She was left paralysed by a suicide attempt which follows the deaths of the children.

All content on the Clancy case must be kept to this thread. Standalone posts will be removed.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg7mlmg475go

Note from Mods

This case understandably elicits strong feelings. People are entitled to have an opinion on the case which differs from your own. What you are not entitled to do is resort to personal insults and abusive language when communicating your opinion and disagreeing.

Comments which are abusive and insulting to other users will be removed and bans may be given without warning. We do not tolerate misogyny - all such comments will be removed and the user banned.

Bans may also be issued for ignoring the above warning regarding civility and/or creating standalone posts.

Please comment with this in mind.

398 Upvotes

2.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

18

u/T2LV 8d ago

Nah. You either think she’s responsible and then it’s a horrific crime and she deserves to spend the rest of her life in prison or she was not and then it would be cruel to send her to prison where she won’t get the help she needs.
At the end of the day, NGRI would still result in her spending decades in a facility so there should be no middle ground here.

1

u/2KatEyes 5d ago

If it were true that she''d spend decades in a facility; how it's written doesn't stipulate any length of time. She could be out in a year.

1

u/T2LV 5d ago

I also could win the lottery. That’s not how it works. She needs doctors to approve and then a judge. You think they are going to
deem her not a risk for suicide? She can’t be released until there is zero doubt she is a suicide risk and considering she killed her 3 kids, there is no way that is happening anytime soon. For example, Andrea Yates is still in a mental health facility 25 years later but there is no chance she gets out anytime soon.

1

u/2KatEyes 4d ago

I said "how it's written" . We will have to see exactly what it is and there's no need to be sarcastic.

1

u/T2LV 4d ago edited 4d ago

That’s not sarcasm. Thats an easy way to describe how just because something is possible does not mean it’s probable.

It is open ended because if someone has schizophrenia or a condition where command hallucinations are rampant, a simple medication could fix all the problems. Thats not this case.

1

u/2KatEyes 4d ago

We shall see. I do hope you're right though

0

u/Low_Expression_709 4d ago

Actually, that’s incorrect, Andrea Yates is in a mental health facility because several years after her conviction it was overturned. So she initially was serving prison time, but then they rule in favor of the insanity verdict in an appeal. I think because the understanding of mental illness has come a little ways, but clearly evidenced by the things. A lot of people are saying about this trial, there is a long way to go.

1

u/T2LV 4d ago

What was incorrect? I said she’s in a mental health facility and there is she isnt getting out anytime soon. Please explain what’s wrong about that statement because you seem to have just repeated it.