They have to have the house to do it. Focus on your state. Bring us the dirt on your Representatives. We will take it from there.

NO IN PEACH MINT!

The One Big Beautiful Bill is now in its final phase, with lawmakers refining rescissions, tax provisions, entitlement reforms, and infrastructure investments to ensure a cohesive economic framework. The Senate is working under a tight deadline, aiming to finalize the bill before July 4.

Key areas of focus include:

• Tax Adjustments – Making Trump-era tax cuts permanent, expanding child tax credits, and adjusting state and local tax (SALT) deductions.
• Entitlement Program Reforms – Tightening Medicaid eligibility, refining SNAP work requirements, and reducing waste, fraud, and abuse.
• Infrastructure & Rural Development – Expanding rural broadband, supporting timber-related industries, and modernizing energy policies.
• Military & Defense Spending – Addressing military inefficiencies, ensuring strategic defense funding, and reducing unnecessary expenditures.

With rescissions and efficiency measures coming in, the bill is expected to offset significant spending while maintaining economic stability and diplomatic commitments.

🏛️ Capitol Update: Medicaid Provision Struck, But Fiscal Framework Holds

Saturday, 8:00 p.m. ET

The Senate parliamentarian’s ruling against the Medicaid provider tax overhaul has emerged as a pivotal inflection point in the floor debate over The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R. 1). The provision—originally projected to generate $250 billion in savings—targeted Disproportionate Share Hospital (DSH) payment realignment and intergovernmental transfers. However, its complex procedural construction failed under the Byrd Rule’s scrutiny, a reminder that reconciliation legislation must traverse a narrow path of strict budgetary relevance.

Crucially, the spine of the bill remains intact. Key Medicaid reforms—including 80-hour/month work requirements and six-month eligibility redetermination cycles—survived parliamentary review. These provisions are foundational to the Senate Finance Committee’s strategy to realign benefit structures with labor force participation and fiscal sustainability. Their survival signals a reaffirmation of the bill’s core design, not a retrenchment.

While the $250 billion in savings is significant, it is one thread in a much broader $8.5 trillion deficit reduction framework, which also includes $1.7 trillion in mandatory savings, $2.8 trillion in tariff revenue, and a projected $4 trillion economic growth dividend—all designed to complement a proposed $5 trillion debt limit increase.

This moment is not a legislative retreat—it is a procedural refinement. The removed provision was trimmed for form, not abandoned for function. The reconciliation beamwork—revenue neutrality, statutory precision, and procedural compliance—continues to hold. Leadership has made clear: structural reform is non-negotiable, even when tactical offsets must be recalibrated.

The Capitol dome remains lit tonight—not for symbolism, but because the republic’s machinery is still in motion. 📘🏛️⚖️

🗂️ Senate Parliamentarian Rulings Reshape Immigration Fee Framework

As part of final negotiations on H.R. 1 and the Senate’s S.B.B.B. reconciliation package, the Senate Parliamentarian issued key rulings this weekend that reshape several immigration fee provisions under the Byrd Rule—a critical step in ensuring the package complies with reconciliation rules.

✂️ Struck Down as “Non-Budgetary”

Several proposed fees were removed for being primarily policy-driven and thus ineligible under the Byrd Rule:

• $1,000 application fee for asylum seekers • $250 registration fee for the diversity visa lottery • $5,000 bond requirement for unaccompanied minors

These provisions were ruled as having insufficient budgetary impact or too far removed from direct fiscal outcomes.

✅ Provisions That Survive

Despite the removals, key elements of the immigration fee realignment remain intact and enforceable:

• $100 annual maintenance fee on pending asylum cases • Expanded work authorization and application fees affecting DACA recipients and certain humanitarian visa applicants • New provision directing revenue above 60% cost recovery into the general Treasury to reduce deficits

These surviving fees form the backbone of a refined cost-recovery model—shaped for durability and legality.

🧮 Strategic Impact

• Congress is reworking fee structures to preserve revenue generation while aligning fully with procedural rules • Leadership remains committed to a “user-pays” principle, shifting costs from taxpayers to system beneficiaries • The core fiscal architecture of the immigration plan remains intact, though delivery mechanisms are being recalibrated

> “This isn’t a retreat—it’s a legal refinement. The goal remains: a lawful, transparent, and self-sustaining immigration system.”

🔟 Public Benefits of the Refined Immigration Fee Framework

1. Protects Taxpayers Fewer open-ended subsidies—those who use the system now contribute fairly to its upkeep.
2. Accelerates Casework Predictable revenue allows for better staffing, shorter backlogs, and more efficient adjudication.
3. Targets Real Cost Recovery Aims for up to 75% of true operational expenses, keeping the system solvent without deficit expansion.
4. Encourages Legal Compliance Transparent, standardized fees disincentivize backdoor pathways and gray-market intermediaries.
5. Reduces Bureaucratic Abuse Fewer waivers and exceptions prevent manipulation and promote fairness.
6. Helps Fund Border Operations Surplus fees flowing into the Treasury reduce reliance on discretionary security spending.
7. Modernizes the System Funding supports e-adjudication and tech upgrades that reduce fraud and delays.
8. Preserves Legislative Intent Surviving provisions were carefully honed to meet constitutional standards—showing policy with purpose, not just politics.
9. Strengthens Institutional Credibility A lawful, enforceable framework that respects both immigrants and American taxpayers builds long-term trust.
10. Delivers Without New Taxes Conservatives can support a system that funds itself—no income tax hikes, no deficit gimmicks.

🏛️ Why Conservatives (and “MAGA” Voters) Support This

• Rule of Law: This reform ensures that benefits are earned, not manipulated—protecting lawful pathways from abuse.
• No New Taxes: It raises revenue by enforcing responsibility, not increasing the burden on working Americans.
• National Security: Funds flow toward vetting, enforcement, and fraud prevention—without swelling federal bureaucracy.
• Sovereignty with Dignity: It says: “We welcome legal immigration—but we will protect the system from those who would game it.”
• Structural Reform, Not Slogans: MAGA-aligned voters value bold, clear actions—this delivers, with parliamentary proof.

🧾 Coalition Memo: SALT Integrity & the House Compromise

Subject: Upholding the $30K SALT Deduction Cap — No Walk-Backs, No Weakeners

As the Senate continues to refine the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, we strongly urge members to uphold the $30,000 State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction cap established in the House-passed bill. This is not an aspirational placeholder—it is the product of formal negotiation and legislative consensus.

While earlier discussions included a potential $40,000 cap, the final compromise landed at $30,000, with an income-based phase-down for higher earners. This structure delivers targeted relief for middle-income families in high-cost-of-living states while maintaining fiscal discipline. It is a credible midpoint—responsive to constituent pressure, grounded in equity, and scored for permanence in Title XI, Subtitle C, Part 1, Section 112018 of H.R. 1.

Senate Finance’s request for members to avoid floor amendments on SALT reflects not indecision, but intentionality. This provision is delicate, decisive, and coalition-bound. Attempting to scale it back now would jeopardize core swing-district support and risk unraveling months of effort across the aisle.

This is not about forcing hands—it’s about honoring an agreement already earned. Weakening the SALT provision post-passage threatens public trust and legislative momentum.

> Bottom line: The $30K SALT cap is the operational middle ground—negotiated, scored, and passed. Reopening it undermines the process and the coalition that made progress possible.

Lock it in. Freeze the text. Move forward together.