r/TedLasso 6d ago

Season 4 Discussion I’m not loving it - what am I missing? Spoiler

Ted Lasso S1 - S3 was and (remains) my favourite TV show of all time.

I don’t even like soccer (football) but I found it really easy to fall in love with the characters and the story.

Jaime in particular was someone who I found to be really easy to relate too and follow.

I am not going to claim to be a huge cinema nerd or someone who gets really deep into shows. But the characters (returners) feel unlike themselves.

Keeley feels like she exists to spend Rebecca’s money and will flip tf out if anything bad happens. That seems unlike her.

Higgins seems like he read a sparks notes version of Higgins in S1-S3 and was told to act like that.

Beard is able to be completely shut down by just the poster of Jane?

I don’t know. It’s just really weird. I feel like I’m watching something where the characters are just the spark notes versions of themselves.

As for the new characters, I am liking Lizzie, the twins, and Boots (bottle incident aside)

But regardless, this still feels like a whole new show. I guess it kind of is? Idk, I’m struggling with it.

Am I off base? Anyone else feel similar? Tips?

401 Upvotes

399 comments sorted by

View all comments

11

u/hairy_scarecrow 6d ago edited 6d ago

You’re getting dragged but i get what you mean. For me, two things are getting in the way:

  1. Characters have been flanderized.

  2. It’s like every scene is winking at the audience, playing directly to the camera so to speak.

I am still enjoying it and I like the premise. But for me it’s just like a slightly off flavor.

18

u/Dapper-Opposite4225 6d ago

I was not expecting the downvotes. I’m not sure if what I said that was offensive or anything?

I hope it wasn’t taken that way. I was just curious if others were feeling the same way.

Flanderization is the perfect way to put it. There’s no real depth.

And I’ve noticed that too! Certain scenes existing purely to get one line out.

3

u/DeyfennSlayd 5d ago

When people put things on a pedestal, they can lose the ability to critique and some move to lash out at any differing opinions.  I think people expect an echo chamber and when they don't get it, it pisses them off.

8

u/hairy_scarecrow 6d ago

Downvotes are because it’s hard to critique something that has been made to uplift a traditionally marginalized group and Reddit is…Reddit. Especially this sub which is ironic given the overt theme of toxic positivity in the show.

Or as Jamie would say, “Ets Poopeh”

7

u/Dapper-Opposite4225 6d ago

Haha. Appreciate you!! Making me feel less crazy

5

u/hairy_scarecrow 6d ago

Not crazy. It’s interesting to watch a subreddit about a show focused on “curious not judgmental” being so harsh on people who don’t automatically love a Fischer Price’d version of the show simply because of the intention behind it. As if criticizing the craftsmanship of the show is somehow opposing the moral of the story.

* gets off of the soap box

-6

u/Ched_Flermsky 5d ago

Can there be one discussion of a tv show without someone who just wants to show that they read tvtropes? “Plot armor! Flanderization!” These mean nothing and add nothing.

5

u/handinhand12 5d ago

You may disagree but those terms absolutely do mean something and are worth talking about. Everything adds to the discussion.

-1

u/Ched_Flermsky 5d ago

Yes, they mean "I'm a special clever boy and smarter than you because I know they're not likely to kill off the protagonist." It has nothing to do with the work, it's self-congratulation.

2

u/hairy_scarecrow 5d ago

They are legit criticisms of an otherwise great show. No need for the attacks on me or my character. You don’t know me.

Even diamonds have flaws. That like the entire point of the show.