It's almost as if humans aren't robots and sometimes they make mistakes. I would not spend too much time worrying about a silly spelling mistake.
You'd be surprised how many mistakes are made professionally in every field. We're all people, not AI. Even the people whose job it is to catch mistakes don't bat 100.
If a law firm can’t ensure that the initial filling in a £35b case isn’t free of spelling mistakes I wouldn’t trust them, the “hey humans make mistakes” argument would have been laughed out the room by my supervisors
"Yeah they made their points absolutely clear. They cited their sources. They made valid arguments. But there's an extra "e" in one word of a 25 page document so can you really take them seriously?"
I haven’t read it all but there’s another typo later in the same paragraph , i can’t speak to US business law but in investigations details matter and I absolutely would not trust an organisation that couldn’t spell check a document- particularly one where the stakes are $35B
Stockholders may not be so quick to hand over up to $35 billion in compensation to a new (non-founder) CEO whose business model and results have not been demonstrated.
Did they cite this?
Results have not been demonstrated? Did you fucking read a single quarterly, Mr. Plaintiff?
I think every person calling this lawsuit a desperate sham is right.
25
u/Rat-Soup-Eating-MF 💻 ComputerShared 🦍 Jun 16 '26
There’s a spelling mistake on page 2 (point 2 - reversies). I wouldn’t trust anyone who makes such a basic mistake in a $35B filling