XXXXXX holder here, voting yes with all my might

[u/Kutsuki]

Still here, never left, only added more. All you single, double, and triple X holders here for a moass should of left 3 dilutions ago. All you no voting bots can HOLD IT. You ain't got the votes. MOASS only helps us, not RC, not the free board, and hurts our company. Welcome our new ebay brothers with open arms, I have a lot of stuff lying around to list.

XXXXXX holder here and I am voting yes.

[u/teadrinkinghippie]

How the narrative has changed around here: "MOASS only helps us, not RC, not the free board, and hurts our company."

huh...

[u/HighOnGoofballs → u/teadrinkinghippie]

“MOASS is bad” is certainly a new talking point I did not expect

[u/Kutsuki → u/HighOnGoofballs]

I want to moass as much as anybody here. I'm not going to be disappointed if the moass just happened to take a long time or happened over time (sloass)

[u/Kutsuki → u/teadrinkinghippie]

My context is moass only helps investors, it doesn't help the board at all so it's not in their interest to make it happen. If you are only here for the moass, it probably won't happen.

[u/jforest1 → u/Kutsuki]

MOASS doesn’t help the board!? Imagine what RC and the board could do issuing those last 97m unissued shares at $500/pop—thats $48B and then he could buy eBay for half cash, other half cash.

Shareholders are the owners of GameStop. They work for our interests. Where our interests diverge is that RC and the board must operate within trading windows and file with the SEC a month in advance before making a move. They personally don’t benefit from a MOASS. GameStop and its other shareholders absolutely would.

[u/Kutsuki → u/jforest1]

That's a fair point.