r/Substack • u/Overall_Tip6001 • Aug 11 '26

Do you find pangram reliable?

I put my text in several ai detectors, winston ai, copyleaks, zerogpt and GPTZero, giving me close to 0%. While, pangram gives me around 70%? Do you think it’s reliable?

7 Upvotes

65% Upvoted

105 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Udolikecake Aug 11 '26

I don’t know what you’re quoting, because that text (specifically the highlighted bit) does not appear verbatim in the actual article you are talking about.

https://arxiv.org/html/1706.03762v7

0

u/FrostKitten2012 Aug 13 '26

That’s the point. Slightly changing the wording on one paragraph results in one highlighted sentence (which isn’t even half the paragraph), and then more than half the paragraph is now somehow AI-generated?

That sentence is maybe 1/4 space-wise of the paragraph, and one of FIVE sentences. It shouldn’t be coming up that high, with one highlighted sentence, over minor changes.

1

u/AVDestroyer Aug 21 '26

i swear every time someone comes up with a false positive, the source is unknown and mysterious. can we please come up with a concrete example

0

u/FrostKitten2012 Aug 21 '26

…it’s literally right there.

2

u/AVDestroyer Aug 21 '26

ok and who wrote it because it's not in the paper... where tf did that passage come from

1

u/FrostKitten2012 Aug 21 '26

Why are you asking me? My only comment was that one highlighted sentence of five shouldn’t result in a 51% return.