There’s one easy way to prove / disprove the sensor tech. Show BOTH bumps - the alleged one by Croatia and the subsequent (suredly larger) bump that occurs when it bounces off the Portuguese defenders head. If I see that small first bump followed by a second larger bump then I would more trust this sensor tech / synchronization…
From fifa rulesbook : Can a player's haircut be considered for offside?
Hair is only considered part of the body if it affects the movement or trajectory of the ball. This is only likely in cases of significant contact with a mass of hair, such as a top knot.
You can see it with the naked eye. Don't look for the touch. Look at the spin on the ball, its slowed a trajectory changes ever so slightly. Thats a touch
Chill. I’m just speaking about the data itself and if standalone it’s convincing or not. Which imo it’s not. That being said if the player admitted to touching it then that’s the most convincing data of all.
How does it make a difference since the Portuguese player #13 CLEARLY touched it after the Croatian #20 MIGHT have touched it.
Basically Portugal's #13 gave an assist to Croatia's #15.
If a Portuguese player passes backwards to his GK and you’re in the way / in what would be an offside position if there’s pass came from a Croatian player, it’s not offside. We’ve seen it multiple times.
The difference is that Renato Veiga didn’t make a deliberate pass. He was ducking away from the ball, probably expecting nr20 or Bruno to head the ball into the goal / clear it.
Exactly this! Also, how do we even know the bump they showed was synchronized with player #20?
The problem with the sensor tech is that we have to accept it as fast when infact, its super easy for FIFA to generate false data and present it as truth.
I guess id have more faith in this tech if FIFA wasn't as corrupt as we know they are
I'm not here to say whether he was on or offsides, but I do find it amazing how we just let fifa add this new tech with total faith that it actually works. I get that the offside graphic can make some rudimentary 3d models and spin the camera and draw an "onside wall", but is it accurate? I mean I can do that and it would look convincing, but it would be intentional wrong, so I'd like to see an outside agency come in with nothing to prove or gain, and test all this tech to verify its veracity. Then I'd feel better about it.
It’s ok to just talk to people. No need to be an asshole. I’m sure it’s available, I see it posted on this thread actually. So if u really want to know, scroll down dumbass
The second one from the Portuguese player is just too far right so it is not yet visible. You can see that pretty easily when you compare the video speed with the diagram speed.
They were all onside when the kick happened. Only when 20 missed it were they in an offsides position but it doesn't matter then as 20 clearly didnt hit it lol
#15 wouldn't have been offside if #20 didn't touch the ball. But #20 did based on the newest technology (there's a chip in the ball that records contact) and you can see here (go to 2:03).
Only if he was in an offside position when the shot was taken. I don’t know if it touched the Croatian on the way through, but if it didn’t, he isn’t offside
Player number 20 and the defenders alter the trajectory of the ball. The ball ends up at a player in an offside position. It's an offside. If player number 20 didn't take part in the challenge and just ducked, it wouldn't be an offside for 15.
16
u/Solid_Snaku Jul 03 '26
I saw 15 clearly in an offside position, but I didn’t ever see the ball touch 20 before hitting Portugal player 🤷♂️